rhy

Unless they mention Israel specifically, this is just a bunch of disinfo from yet another bad actor.

CowboyXero

Oh sure....now they come around.

ScientiaPotentia

Of course, the perpetrator of a crime wants to shift the blame to the victim.

SaneGoatiSwear

i rebuttled the shit outta him.

enjoy.

Elemental_Lightning

Doesn't matter, the truth will come out, which ever actually carried out the destruction of the towers, they will feel swift justice of the american people. ...... babahaha yeah right, american people can't get off their fat asses, and see that their government is beyond repair.

Volcris

which part would you like? It taking 2 hours, or the fact that the north tower's base was bombed in 1993? Or that the beams may have been compromised by temperature?

RedLeader

Who are we supposed to focus our hatred on?

k_digi

ha ha ha

revofire

We already made our rebuttal. It's proven that it was an inside job by general knowledge and common sense. However we're always open to argument, but remember to realistically address ALL points and not just one. Also his argument is flat out wrong.

TooBigForHollywood

The push to blame Saudi Arabia is 911 Bullsh*t of the Third Kind, after OBL did it and GW Bush & Dick Cheney were responsible arrive at 1 & 2 - IT WAS JEWS!

There were no hijackers, the planes that hit the WTC Towers were piloted by remote control.

Using technology developed by conspirator Rabbi Dov Zakheim , who stole 2.3 trillion dollar$ from the US Government while comptroller at the Pentagon, who with Zionists Jerome Hauer and Michael Chertoff engineered the whole project.

No plane at Shanksville a cruise missile slammed into the Pentagon, "celebrating" Jews were filming as the WTC Towers went down.

Thousands of Jews were away from the WTC on the day, while warnings to stay away came from NY synagogues the Friday before, and from the Odigo Hebrew language messaging service.

The plan is to bring Barak Obama and millions of co defendants in politics, law enforcement, and news broadcasting to trial and hangin' for spurning the same evidence!

More wretched is that the Saudis refuse to set the record straight and to " cast truth " as per the injunction in the Koran, which surely identifies the lot as unbelievers and as tools of Zion.

faultyfix

*three

OneTrueCube

Three buildings with only two planes. Extra value combo

Joe_McCarthy

The Iranians say this all the time. The Saudis are playing catch up.

pray_the_gay_away

What a fantastic twist of events it would be if the Saudis finally decided that they have a lot more in common with Iran after all, and 15 years of US hegemony in the Middle East comes crashing down.

Joe_McCarthy

Pretty soon the Middle East is going to be a low priority for the US anyway. In fact this turn with the Saudis is even a reflection of our decreasing dependence on the region. We would not have compromised relations with the KSA like this even fifteen years ago.

So it's more like we're telling them to fuck themselves and they're girl punching.

tanukihat

So, they said Bush did 9/11?

Stupid ragheads, we've already known that for years.

Next they'll tell us jet fuel can't melt steel beams.

Edit: Dang y'all it was a joke

Volcris

Heat can weaken the beams to make them bend. A slight bend can set off a catastrophic collapse. It took almost two hours for the towers to collapse, plenty of cook time to weaken the beams. Also, it's easy to forget that in 1993 another terrorist attack looking to take down the towers involved the detonating of a half ton truck bomb at the base of the north tower. It's unknown how the structural integrity of the north tower was effected by this blast at its base, but it likely contributed.

Think about it, both bush sr and Clinton waged offensives in the region, and America has been in wars its entire history. Did America really need to blow up its own buildings to convince its people to keep doing the same shit it was already doing?

The Saudis are deflecting, because the redacted portion of the 9/11 papers includes what anyone who has read wiki leaks already knows. The Saudis are the primary funders of terrorism, and Saudi citizens and royalty were both directly involved with training the hijackers.

Hektik

Explain building 7 in regard of that talking head regurgitation. Or the fact that jet fuel wasn't present outside the area of impact. How does the top floor impact collapse the bottom floor? Or a building that wasn't as hit directly like building 7. Also the prior attack gave motive of reinforcing the buildings which was already done a year prior or so to the attacks.

Also explain to me how none of these skyscrapers crashed into its own footprint. https://imgur.com/a/w5iuG

http://s224.photobucket.com/user/88Badmachine88/media/MH2.jpg.html

FOIA request of Turner Construction doing "fireproofing" renovations prior to 9/11

Alias_Unknown

I'll give it a shot, let's see how low I can go.

When an 800,000 lb plan collides with a structure at roughly 400 miles per hour that energy is transferred to the structure. This would momentum would sheer many secondary supporting structures on its way theough. Any sizeable chunks (particularly the engine) that strike the primary support beams could easily dislodge them from their optimal positions.

This sort of tremendous force coming from an angle that was never imagined by the designers would seriously compromise the structure.

Now there were quite a few floors on top of the impact site. That's a hell of a lot of weight sitting on top of a now seriously compromised structure.

Now take that scenario and add the fire.

I imagine it knocked the sprinklers out for the surrounding floors, although they wouldn't have helped too much.

A 747's fuel tanks, like most airplanes, are located inside the wings. When they follow the fuselage through the intitial gap in the building, they're going to either fold back again the plane, or sheer off, depending on the amount of resistance they meet.

I imagine it did a bit of both, but either way, upon entering it started spraying fuel which became an aerosol and ignited.

Let me side track for a moment and remind you how intense a normal office fire is. Basically everything in an office building is flammable. Some of it like that cubical wall or the hundreds of pounds of paper is more flammable than others. Office fires burn fiercely due to how hot some of that shit burns at.

Add that into the equation.

So basically all of this heat would travel upwards through the path of least resistance, the elevator shaft. It would eventually heat some damaged beams to the point that they would slump. All this weight compiled on top of them would force them to slump even further.

Eventually one fails, maybe that wasn't enough, perhaps more started to fall, causing a cascade.

It all seems reasonable if you look at the physics of it.

Now, inb4 as the kids say.

I can't explain shit for WT7, maybe the CIA took an open opportunity to get rid of some stuff.

SomewhatNeutral

Also explain to me how none of these skyscrapers crashed into its own footprint. https://imgur.com/a/w5iuG

Funny how there are no depictions of the south side of 7:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WJgFc4wIaQ

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_fire.html

revofire

No one ever replies after you mention building and 7 together in one sentence. It was clearly an inside job, no one wants to admit it though.

revofire

Actually, link me. I want to see that.

SaneGoatiSwear

it's linked in another comment on this thread, but here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk

that's someone else's clip of the same thing.

revofire

Let's be fair, he meant pull out the firefighters. I know it was a controlled demolition but I don't think this guy was alluding to that with his statement.

Lag-wagon

Posting so I can come back to this and watch this shit show unfold.

kryptoniankoffee

What a twist.

klongtoey

there's also a video of john kerry saying similar thing about wtc7.

Tat_Tvam_Asi

Ummm... are all building set to be "pulled" in case of an emergency like a fire? Are people at work right now with explosives all around them? I ask because I'm under the impression it takes a long time to set the charges to demolish a building. This video implies there were charges set before that day.

Tat_Tvam_Asi

what i do know is that silverstein had 0 permits in place for emergency systems like that,

Is there such a thing? I mean, who wants to work in a building that can be set to collapse instantly? How could such a permit even be legal? Every building I have ever seen with charges placed on it were off limits to everyone unless they were setting the charges.

Tat_Tvam_Asi

Assuming you already know where to put them. Is that a standard practice when a building goes up? Do they figure out ahead of time how to take it down?