dragonsarefake

ITT: Proof that /v/conspiracy conspirators are analytical and very much sane.

Sensei

This author is a lunatic. Not only does he not know the name of Switzerland, he claims that every time the Bible says "God" it actually means "(G)reenland (o)f (D)enmark".

Many other things as well; things about the Holy Roman Empire, the Holy See, etc. which are just ridiculous.

Personally I wouldn't trust this man very much.

Edit: Just read this, lol.

"The merger of these two medieval orders spawned the creation of the country of Switzerland in 000 AD."

Apparently not very fluent in the arts of "knowing dates".

dragonsarefake

TL;DR Author of article doesn't even know that Suisse is not "an official name of Switzerland", Suisse is Switzerland in french. If he can hardly grasp the countries name I don't expect him to know much about geo-politics and the very complex horror that ISIS is.

Sensei

Reading some of this guy's work is absolutely horrifying. Not only does he not know that Switzerland's name isn't "Confoederationis Helveticae" (that's part of an inscription on the Federal Palace, the country's name is Confoederatio Helvetica), he actually believes that 000 AD was in the Medieval Ages and Switzerland was formed at that time. .

That doesn't even make sense. Schwyz, Uri & Unterwalden were the 3 founding cantons and put themselves together in 1291 AD. Switzerland adopted Schwyz' flag, which was a red background with a white cross in the top left corner.

The cross wasn't even a symbol yet in 000 AD. LOL.

dragonsarefake

Haha I didn't even read that part, what a bat shit crazy backwards nut job lunatic.

Sensei

Just made a post refuting his "10 Arguments why Switzerland is the home of the CIA".. this guy is quite crazy.

flyawayhigh

Related from same source:

‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Are Causing Militants To Abandon ISIS

SO, never let it be said that "conspiracy theories" do no good! : D

dragonsarefake

While we're on the topic of the source... Is it any good? I'm not trying to be snarky, that is a genuine question.

Sensei

Do not trust this guy. He has no clue about history nor any common sense.

The way this guy writes his stuff, it appears as if he's trying to snatch money from unknowing customers.

flyawayhigh

I have to admit, I'm not familiar with this source, and the article itself is not clearly reliable or unreliable based on the content. :D

I figured I'd post it here and let everyone else do the work for me!

dragonsarefake

What am I saying, an article that far fetched would make AFP look like a bad source. :)

It's all based on the apparent blowing of a 700 year cover of that infamous agency created 64 years ago.