**Summary: The FBI seems to be focusing on the drone aspects of the Clinton emails. These emails tell a disturbing picture of disregard for human life, no vetting of targets, and possible violations of international laws and treaties.**

It has become apparent that large social media groups like twitter and facebook, as well as Google, have been doing their best to polish the turd that is Hillary Clinton. It does not make any sense. It is too expensive, and there where plenty of better candidates that the democrats could have pushed, that would have made excellent puppets.

So why Hillary? Why promote a dynasty?

The answer is that as president she would have access to national security laws, and other laws to protect her and her information. She would have better protection from prosecution, and be able to cover up her wrongdoing.

Her slip up with the emails was serous. Aside from inadvertently revealing connections to major banking powers, she revealed that the vetting for drone targets was non-existent. This is what they do not want the public to look at, and this is what the FBI seems to be instigating.

Based on what appears to be leaks from the FBI, as well as what was found in the wiki leaks documents, it appears that there was no oversight in the Obama drone program. Targets where hit after they where chosen, and no care or concern was given. It is the 21st centuries version of carpet bombing.

Worse still, evidence from both the Clinton emails, and released documents reveals that many of the drone strikes where done to give the appearance of progress in the war on terror. That many of the targets where mistakes, but that the US took action simply to take action.

In essence, the Obama administration was behaving with the same disregard for human life as the Johnson administration did in Vietnam. Only instead of agent orange and napalm, it was haphazard drone attacks on weddings and community markets.

If these emails and policies where to become public, it would be both a humiliation to the United States, and it would probably become an UN investigation into human rights violations and war crimes.

While the UN is as useless as a castrated porn star, the scrutiny would both damage the US image abroad, and possibly result in a treaty banning the use of armed drones, something that many people in the government and avionics industry do not want to see.