Much the same way that Fox news calls themselves "fair and balanced"

Do they really think that a second investigation is going to suddenly uncover new evidence that supports the controlled demolition theory?

And what if, after this new investigation, they conclude that the building collapsed due to fire as originally presented in the NIST report? Will AE911Truth suddenly pack it up and shut down?

You could have an investigation conducted by a private, vetted team of experts, where every minute detail and every piece of evidence is collected according to strict scientific chain of custody rules, and every step of the investigation is under a microscope of scrutiny on both sides of the issue. But if the final summary concludes that it was fire that caused the structural failure and subsequent collapse of WTC7, the truthers will just keep bitching and moaning that something somewhere was corrupt and proclaim that the whole investigation was a sham.

Nothing will convince the devout zealots that they're side is right and the rest of the world is wrong. The truthers will never believe anything that doesn't support their position. Ever.

Predictions:

• Initiative will be there on the back of the ballot in near-microscopic print in the middle of the instructions in 8 different languages, where nobody notices it, much like Bloomberg's 3rd term ballot initiative.

• By default, skipping this question will count as a vote "against" investigation, rather than not being counted.

• This bullshit will be used to point and say --- see, the vast majority accept the official narrative!