Man, this reeks of foul play. Dallas mass police shooting was on late on Thursday july 9th, and Rich was gunned down on the morning of the 12th. Perfect media cover. Murder happened in a rich neighborhood, and nothing was stolen.

From what I can tell, voter expansion data is fed to algorithms to predict voter turnout. It has apparently proved to be very accurate. This same data would be strong evidence of voting fraud, especially if it was large-scale. The director in particular would probably be the one who makes the final call on the accuracy of the data.

I found something else while I was researching this type of data collection.

Terry McAuliffe’s campaign built and utilized a polling place locator tool in partnership with the DNC. The tool is streamlined and user-friendly, but the technology that powers it took years to develop, test, and refine. Over the course of the election, approximately the same number of people used the tool to find their polling place as the number of voters who ended up being Governor McAuliffe’s margin of victory. In 2014, Democrats across the country will be able to to use a white-label version of the same tool to help direct voters to the polls on Election Day. Source

I am really sketched out by this tool. Consider what could be done with a right metadata, and some real-time human inputs:

Lets say im a voter that is a registered republican, meaning my address is on file somewhere for someone to buy. The tool sends me to a downtown polling location, with a 90 minute wait. Next, a registered democrat uses the same tool in the same place, but is sent an extra mile to a polling station with a 15 minute line. I wonder how many people turn away when they see that 90 minute wait? I would imagine being able to filter users by their political party would not only increase dem turnout, it would decrease GOP turnout as well.

Shot twice in the back.