Bill Clinton had charisma, and Bush had broken his tax pledge. The odds were weakly in favor of Clinton already. Today. Trump has charisma and a populist following, while Clinton is unpleasant and has decades of ill-will built up. The odds are in his favor, despite the barrage of insults that people believe to be true.

In my view, Democrats and Sanders supporters are looking for something else to do, and Johnson presents himself more like a Democrat than a Republican. If you want to go with just numbers, he could split the vote in favor of Trump. The problem is we just don't know, and making these sorts of bizarre calculations is all wrong. Vote for the better candidate, or don't vote at all.

But there's always a problem. Out of the parties with visible polling in the Presidential election (Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green), three are offering up gun-grabbers (see Weld's history, and Johnson's support for him), and Trump is weak on the subject. What happens when every candidate is outright opposed to the Constitution? Why are we being held hostage by voters who would shout us down and use government violence to silence us?

GJ is supposed to take votes from trump, and give hillary the majority, and under the "winner take all" system, she gets all the votes.

Well, that, and he would sign the TPP