webrustler

A fortnight (heh) ago, I commented on this post. Back then the full text article had been read just shy of 6000 times. Their next popular article has to date been read just over 7000 times and it was put online in 2009.

This one has been online for three weeks now and the full text has almost 200000 views. Holy shit! Even correcting for some tinfoil heads artificially inflating those numbers, this is fucking impressive.

Be sure to check back on their page during the next few weeks.

WhiteRonin

I had a feeling from almost the moment of impact that something was amiss. Watching buildings that big housing thousands of people couldn't be engineered back then to be an insurance right off. Even with the idea if cutting corners, some semblance of humanity had to engineer in fire; only a true hearted cold blooded killer would engineer something that would knowingly fail. So, based on keeping loss due to fire at a reasonable loss would be part of the calculations even if terrorism wasn't included would still mean the building would stand long enough for a majority of people to get out. Thus, i started thinking a highly trained demo team placed explosives to take out the buildings ...

Was this a pearl harbor moment? Don't know but America lost a majority of their freedoms and nativity that fateful day.

I don't even want to be the fly on the wall listening to that conversation since I suspect it would mean instant death.

WhiteRonin

Nah, you don't say. This has been said since like the next day. Ever notice how they just collapsed si quickly and nicely?