Sameblamegame

To each their own. That's not my style, but more power to you.

Sameblamegame

Right. So then asking if people are shilling is going to smoke them out then? There are more eloquent ways to pull that information out of people in a conversation. You can't put them on guard right off the bat. But they are your observations, do what you wish with them. That's just what I'd do. I can't say I don't like a bold accusation once in awhile, if you think you have it right.

Sameblamegame

I notice a lack of activity here considering the posts being made mostly. Bouncing back between /r conspiracy and here is like day and night. I think the amount of traffic here doesn't really constitute heavy (note, I said heavy) thread manipulation, despite whatever pattern you might think you see. It's okay to have a hunch, but don't expect me to pat your back for voicing something possible that we all pretty much think is possible. There are also a lot of people who just believe something that is opposite to what you believe. Being able to see a pattern doesn't make you automatically correct. It just gives you a better place to see and form observationsfrom, sometimes, if you guess right.

meowski

No doubt in my mind after carefully reviewing Wakefield's work, and the exposed CDC coverup, that vaccines cause autism. Also just common sense- you can not inject a child with a slew of different neurotoxins and garbage and expect it not to have any side effects.

Unreasonable

Vaccine realists must be making headway for them to drop such a bullshit false flag. Create a bullshit study showing vaccines cause autism to let all the vaccine induced autistics online tear it apart and keep the fact that vaccines cause health problems from the public even more.

You will never see a well funded, well documented, real science based look into vaccine induced health problems ever.

How one could come to a conclusion when half the image is covered up is beyond me.

Sciency

You will never see a well funded, well documented, real science based look into vaccine induced health problems ever.

Its very true, but consider the amount of time it takes to observe a vaccinated child become an adult. A proper study would also require human testing, meaning that these kids would potentially go unvaccinated, leading to a sample bias (in that certain kinds of parents would not allow their children participate in the study, and parental behavior cam be argued to be in part, a genetic trait). This study would never make it past an ethics board either, gicen their rules about informed consent and accurate discription of risks involved.

A double-blind would also be very hard to achieve, as children would not be allowed to enroll in school without a vax history.

Its a real bitch, but it would actually be illegal to perform this study, since it would have to be performed outside of ethical review boards.

un1ty

and yet we do the opposite - inject ubiquitously without concern because "trust" and "science"

Fiacre54

reported findings from anonymous online questionnaires completed by 415 mothers of home-schooled children 6-12 years old

Well as long as the science checks out...

Phobos_Mothership

reported findings from anonymous online questionnaires completed by 415 mothers of home-schooled children 6-12 years old

Wow how did they dispute these findings? They're airtight!

Edit: Fiacre54 You beat me to it, I had this exact line on my clipboard. Some people don't actually read the articles.

tecuani

There was no other science involved but empirics, and that one was just not done well (possibly biased set of samples, entirely based on unverifiable claims).

Sameblamegame

If anything was getting paid for it wouldn't be observations or opinions that would lose money for a large industry known for lobbying and buying profitable scientific fact.