I like this line of thinking. Not sure if you, or another goat, but i've seen that national enquirer line before, and it really makes ya think :)

but what would the last "most redpilled" person think? I got the men in black reference, and I like to believe there's nuggets of truth in the tabloids. But thats where my pill wore off.

Possible, or perhaps there never was a leaker, and the documents were provided to have this sort of effect on the election. It matches the narrative about NSA/FBI/CIA being at war with each other, perhaps the NSA is the leaker.

Its all speculation I guess. The whole embassy story just seems fishy to me. I can't imagine how you could get assange out, unless the embassy was in on it. He went to that building in particular because (in theory) Ecuador doesn't have an extradition treaty with the US, and then he gets extradited anyway? Or killed without the embassy even saying a word? It doesn't add up.

Which makes the whole thing more suspicious. Why would wikileaks, famed for their protection of the whistle-blower, give away person information about the leaker? My personal opinion is that wikileaks is compromised, and nothing they say on their twitter account (of all places) should be taken with more than a grain of salt.

5 more hours..

http://findingassange.com/?i=3

Now, ask yourself why the National Enquirer hasn't been sued out of existence over libelous claims?

Becase they aren't credible. I've heard the same argument for infowars actually. Basically they dream up one in 10 stories themselves as a defense against lawsuits. Behind closed doors they can cite a few wild articles and claim "we are obviously satire, so whats the big deal?"

if it comes out that seth rich leaked this just wait for a false flag the next day to bury the story

It doesn't matter what anyone says now. The MSM have their orders. Watching good morning America this morning, all they could talk about how it has been confirmed that Putin himself did the hacking.

The original story was broke in the Daily Mail? I was always under the impression that they were like the UK's National Enquirer.