xeemee

There was no debri at the pentagon or the Pennsylvania crash.

110% totally wrong - read my other comments in this thread, or do some (real) research on your own

jerry

OP is a pizza gater reddfuge..

kiiiiiiTttty

From what I gather, planes did fly into the buildings, although perhaps not commercial ones. There are videos showing lousy editing on planes in the live footage which probably was more to simply make them look a bit more commercial. People probably did board that plane and make phonecalls, but were somewhere else at the time, perhaps switched with the fake planes from the beginning.

srayzie

There are several documentaries zooming into those plane's. Especially the Pentagon. The wing span damage to the building was way too small to be a commercial airplane. There were a lot of witnesses saying it wasn't a commercial airline. What about Pennsylvania where there were no debris? Just a hole in the ground. That doesn't happen. There would be airplane pieces.

xeemee

The wing span damage to the building was way too small to be a commercial airplane.

look at the early photographs, not the smoky cropped bullshit from Loose Change

There were a lot of witnesses saying it wasn't a commercial airline.

and a lot more saying it was

What about Pennsylvania where there were no debris?

xeemee

you need to stop listening to Alex Jones type "news"

it was essentially an "inside job" with Israeli fingerprints all over it, but there were planes and anyone telling you otherwise is a moron

srayzie

There are several documentaries zooming into those plane's. Especially the Pentagon. The wing span was way too small to be a commercial airplane. There were a lot of witnesses saying it wasn't a commercial airline. What about Pennsylvania where there were no debris! Just a hole in the ground. That doesn't happen. There would be airplain pieces. You should try watching some of these documentaries before you judge and call people morons.

xeemee

i've seen probably every piece of video and every document you have plus likely a truck load more - i've researched 9-11 for several years (and for a few months, 8-18 hrs. a day, 7 days a week) - and i'm telling you flat out that the information you're consuming is utter bullshit produced by morons or those trying to discredit the truth movement or those trying to sell you something - period

the fucking monkeys that made Loose Change and all of the other "documentaries" like it are idiots to an extreme and/or disinformation artists

you're apparently very new to 9-11 research and you're promoting garbage that has been completely debunked a decade ago and is no longer accepted by any semi-serious researcher

look at what people like Sibel Edmonds , James Corbett , Ryan Dawson and Christopher Bollyn have to say - read the 9-11 timeline from History Commons

srayzie

I'm promoting garbage? I'm on a damn conspiracy sub. Forget that? I've looked into this for years too. Who says you hold all the knowledge to 911? Get over yourself. Were you in the science lab while they tested DNA? Were you at the Pentagon to see the damage? Is it ok to question things? Yeah, it's called freedom of speech. Obviously you watch too much MSM. If you can't understand questioning the original story, then maybe a conspiracy sub isn't for you. Go take your meds now.

xeemee

Go take your meds now.

i stopped with the Flinstone vitamins long ago

jerry

There were pieces dick weed. Fucking boeing engines crashed into buildings in new york and landed in the street below. Feds came in the day of and seized every found piece of plane in the city. Trucked it off before it could be seen by any other people. Same story for the other two planes that crashed at pentagon and in that field

srayzie

You need to stop watching CNN dip shit.

xeemee

you need to look at the photographs ... preferably with both eyes open this time

srayzie

You need to stop playing with your brown eye

jerry

go back to reddit you gay retard

Kwijibo

Some theories say that the planes that hit the buildings were not the planes with the passengers on them, but remote controlled dummies, and that the real planes were diverted to some other location.

srayzie

Yes. That's what I'm wondering

srayzie

You've got anger issues as if you're the conspiracy police. How many times are you going to comment on my topic? Bored?

xeemee

what i have is evidence - something you apparently do not

i've given you many links now that challenge everything you've stated

what have you offered to support your dribble? nothing ... nothing at all, other than more dribble and personal attacks

looking forward to the day when you can prove that the plane that hit the Pentagon ... didn't hit the Pentagon

or the plane that dug a hole in Schwenksville ... wasn't a plane

good luck with that - you'll need it

srayzie

Who ever said that I was debating or providing evidence. I said I've always wondered. I'm not going to read evidence that a prick sends me. You do not impress me

xeemee

I'm not going to read evidence ...

like they say - ignorance is bliss

drainthepizzaria

I'm not going to read evidence that a prick sends me.

I've always wondered how people get so successful at spreading falsehoods as truth, and now I realize it's with major thanks to idiots like you; people who have to be spoon-fed with flowery comments so they can feel "safe" from the information. Just because the tone is frustrated doesn't refute the content. If you want the info, read it, and stop being weak.