toobaditworks

It's spelled wrong in your linked search. But it still says there's no hits when spelled correctly but it gives the website url. Tried it with MSNBC and brings up a bunch of stories. So yeah they are censoring it. Reading the comments I see you've covered this already. Good catch.

site:inforwars.com

coincidencesmyass

First they don't come up in the news tab. This is like the slow boil of the frog. Eventually I bet we won't be able to google it and have it come up at all. Then we'll have to type it directly into the url. That will last a while. Then one day we'll type their address in and it won't come up at all.

TheTrigger

Exactly.

hotairmakespopcorn

I'm fairly conflicted about this. I've generally ignored them because they talk about things which I personally do not find very credible. Or at the least, unsubstantiated. Which means I can't really talk to anyone else about it else it damages my own credibility. And if I can't talk about it, it doesn't do me any good.

But... they do sometimes cover legitimate topics or different perspectives on topics which others simply refuse to cover. In the wasteland of leftist MSM, having a voice against the chorus, even if out of tune, is better than mass propaganda.

That said, censorship is censorship. Given that Google, on average, has someone at the Whitehouse 200-days out of the year, it's not unreasonable to label this as indirect and unconstitutional censorship.

Google sucks. Shame on them.

Rex_Phil0

Yandex.com

piratse

Oh I get what OP is saying now. It does come up when you google it. But it doesn't come up when you click the news tab. Interesting. Thanks.

TheTrigger

You know, I never paid much attention to InfoWars, because it seemed kinda "way too out there". But now that they're being blacklisted by places, it's time to give them a second glance.

cdglow

It's kind of funny that this is the perspective that many people have of Infowars because the overwhelming majority of their content is just typical political/business/government/cultural news + opinion from some mix of a paleo-conservative/libertarian/rightish/distrusting-government perspective and sourced and verified from usually mainstream sources. They're not perfect: like any humans they have their own biases. Sometimes they've been guilty of hyperbole. Personally I think if you're wrong, it's better to err on the side of being too distrustful of the government than being too trusting of them, so I'd forgive that as at least they're not out to screw the world.

If anything, I'd criticize them for not covering any off the wall topics like UFOs or bigfoot or whatever strictly to add a bit of entertainment once in a while.

Turnip_Time

That or the powers that be are trying to legitimize filter man in the eyes of conspiracy theorists by pretending like they are against him. Much like the Jews did with Trump to get all the anti-Semites to vote for his kosher ass.

Rex_Phil0

This guy got it in one. Jones is a misdirect, ramping people up to the realization that they have been lied to, then pointing them back down into the cave.

TheTrigger

Clicking enter on your link redirects to the main search page. If you click back to specify "News" it still comes up blank.

piratse

I get infowars when I google it.