Hello,

Lately I have spoke up to two separate mods who each have a dominating power control on a broad topic verse, both offering rejection towards anything that doesn't abide by the story of their systems. They have on multiple occasions rejected any alternative aspects regardless of the intellectual idea, and have labeled all conspiracy-related talk as nothing but made up stories. Instead of development on the open discussion, they have avoided any talk on the subject and instead decided to make fun of it. I come here today to offer an open discussion on the issue that I feel these particular individuals don't seem to be fair as moderators, and the awareness of it is at a low. Every comment offering some rational response has fallen prey to downvotes in conversations where they only participate in (mostly together). Since I have offered ideas to help minimize abuse, they have voiced against it and used discriminatory words to discredit anything I have said. I have now watched in the short moments since their recent activity a very large increase of negative voting against the comments I offered towards them. I cannot acuse them of downvoting as that is not my dilemma, it is the attitudes of such individuals in control. I have kept a civil and fair approach, and would like to hear some outside input, particularly from the folks who have experienced such behavior before or can maintain a rational conversation on the matter.

Do you think that individuals like this make good moderators, and is it fair for the user base to be subjected to poor behavior from moderators?

In reference you can check out the primary abuse here as well as the where I offered my ideas to improve Whoaverse from such abuse

The rest can be trace through my username where you can find even more evidence of negative input towards their ideologies

Please avoid attacking through the use of Shill accusations, and avoid provoking conflict.