anthonylancer

I keep running around in circles, only one idea sets me back on my path. Through various research I've found that the central and sole path to knowledge is meditation. I applaud the websites on which i 'wasted' my time (reddit pre-2016, voat, 8chan) for reminding me every once in a while that many have come to a conceptual understanding of god or magic but few have sat down to meditate for even a minute.

KEK_is_truth

Lots to research and some great comments. Thanks OP.

cdglow

Hey OP, I don't intend to denigrate you personally, your thoughtful and well-written post, or to dissuade you from speculating or looking for the truth. In fact, I'd love to encourage you and read more of these ideas here. There needs to be more posts like yours on forums like these.

But to me it looks like you've fallen for the biggest conspiracy about physics. The last 100 years or so of physics has been teaching students false knowledge about atomism/quantum/relativity bullshit. To modern science, everything in the universe is just a suitcase full of continuously invented particles: photons, electrons, muons, gluons, quarks. Science even has to invent "virtual particles" to try and explain fields and instantaneous action at a distance. Or they have to basically bring back the idea of ether by calling it "quantum fluid" so they can save face.

Science can describe many phenomena and we have models that work in many cases, but there's a difference between a description and an actual explanation. My opinion is that physics needs basically a massive reset and you have to go back 100 years to the original thoughts of people like Tesla, Heaviside, JC Maxwell & CP Steinmetz who gave us basically the entire modern world and start over.

I do however believe that there might be something to the idea of something linking physics and (I'd guess many would call it) theology.

RandoKillriian

I'm pretty partial to Russellian theory. In a round about way the angry photographer or youtube user Theoria Apophasis proves, at least explains the more simplistic aspects of russelian theory through a magnetic lens. If you haven't seen his videos on magnetism watch them all. Its well worth it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9S3ikiL3Ow

cdglow

Definitely. I like his videos a lot and many of my ideas are influenced by Ken Wheeler's discussions on magnetism and physics. If anybody reading this is interested in the subject and hasn't seen some of that guys videos before check them out. There's definitely a lot that he's talked about magnetism and many areas of physics that I don't think modern mainstream science even comes close to explaining.

However, the unfortunate thing is that he's not a particularly effective communicator to normal people.

Wuttier

Agreed. And let's call this reset and unification of all the sciences and spiritual theories 'Alchemy' again. No joke.

un1ty

Law of One / Ra Material!

But for modern, wanderer level, incarnate information, this is akin to Nassim Haramein and his Resonance University. I'd love to join and become more familiar. ( http://resonance.is/) )

d8_thc

Yep.

13.5 Questioner: Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing in the creation?

Ra: I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity is creation. (Surprise, the quantum vacuum has a formally infinite energy density that is 'removed' by modern physics)

13.6 Questioner: From this infinity then must have come what we experience as creation. What was the next step or the next evolvement?

Ra: I am Ra. Infinity became aware. This was the next step.

13.7 Questioner: After this, what happened?

Ra: Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity as an aware or conscious principle called by us as closely as we can create understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.

13.8 Questioner: Can you state the next step?

Ra: The next step is still at this space/time nexus in your illusion achieving its progression as you may see it in your illusion. The next step is an infinite reaction to the creative principle following the Law of One in one of its primal distortions, freedom of will. Thus many, many dimensions, infinite in number, are possible. The energy moves from the intelligent infinity due first to the outpouring of randomized creative force, this then creating patterns which in holographic style appear as the entire creation no matter which direction or >energy is explored. These patterns of energy begin then to regularize their own local, shall we say, rhythms and fields of energy, thus creating dimensions and universes.

un1ty

Awesome. So glad this work is becoming more and more mainstream and understood.

Great post!

d8_thc

Thanks friend :)

SwiftLion

Here's the problem: if you calculate that the universe is holographic in nature, you still need "dark matter" to account for the fact that you can only observe 0.1x as much matter as is needed to produce our universe's behavior.

The holographic principle is the "old and busted" in this area. This theory suggests that information is held in spacetime itself, and the "weight" of that information provides the force usually ascribed to "something real that we just totally can't observe"--unproved, unobserved "dark matter".

https://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-theory-gravity-dark.html

So, all in all, you have a nice idea. But your hypothesis still requires that nine-of-ten particles are magic, weakly interacting, hard to observe particles of "dark matter".

d8_thc

So this isn't my theory by a long shot - it's by a man named Nassim Haramein

Here's his Ted Talk:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJsl_klqVh0

However, dark matter is no longer necessary in this view.

Because spin (torsion) has been added to the Einstein field equations, you no longer need dark matter to explain the extra rotational behavior of galaxies. Since matter is spinning space, you get a lumineferous aether without violating the Michaelson Morley experiments.

His theoretical research on the topic of the magnetohydrodynamics of astrological and cosmological plasma phenomena was first published in his 2008 paper (with Elizabeth Rauscher) “Scale Unification: A Universal Scaling Law”. In this paper he and Rauscher elucidate a beautiful universal scaling law that shows how fractal self-similarity is found at all scales of spinning structures in the universe, and explain, “In a spacetime which incorporates a source of angular momentum in the stress energy tensor … galactic structures … may be best described by magnetohydrodynamics driven by the structure of spacetime itself.” He and Rauscher then explore cosmological magnetohydrodynamics with deeper mathematical rigor in the paper “Collective Coherent Oscillation Plasma Modes in Surrounding Media of Black Holes and Vacuum Structure – Quantum Processes with Considerations of Spacetime Torque and Coriolis Forces” (2010). Here they find that the inclusion of torque and Coriolis in Einstein’s field equations is sufficient to explain the motion of large cosmological scale structures such as galaxies and galactic clusters, showing that it is unnecessary to resort to some new theoretical particle (such as the putative WIMPs).

drexhex

Dark matter is unnecessary in this theory, and I'm not sure where you got the 'magic particles' idea?

SwiftLion

I'm using the term "magic particle" to refer to the unsatisfying definition of dark matter as "weakly interacting massive particles", meaning they only interact insofar as they exert gravitational pull.

I don't see how your hypothesis can get around that issue. Can you explain to me how standard relativity requires dark matter--and can achieve a holographic universe where all information is encoded on the "skin" of spacetime--but this hypothesis you've made has both a holographic aspect, but also predicts the universe's current behavior without a "free variable" to account for 90% of the needed mass being missing?

Specifically, this hypothesis I linked to in my earlier comment explains that extra gravitation by asserting that dark matter is not real, and that we can explain the universe's behavior best if the universe is not, in fact, holographic in nature.

d8_thc

spacetime--but this hypothesis you've made has both a holographic aspect, but also predicts the universe's current behavior without a "free variable" to account for 90% of the needed mass being missing?

Torsion/Coriolis effect of spinning space (instead of simple curving of space).

THE ORIGIN OF SPIN: A CONSIDERATION OF TORQUE AND CORIOLIS FORCES IN EINSTEIN’S FIELD EQUATIONS AND GRAND UNIFICATION THEORY ](http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/torque_paper.pdf))

Side note: This was co-written by an extremely accomplished nuclear physicist, Elizabeth Raushcer.

But here is an article on how this paper removes the necessity of dark matter

http://resonance.is/10-million-dollar-dark-matter-detector-finds-nothing-so-far-suggests-previous-potential-results-were-incorrect/

SwiftLion

This is really cool! Thank you so much for sharing, this is something I actually haven't heard of before. I'll read through these after work today. It's actually been a long time since somebody threw whitepapers at me that I haven't seen. :)

d8_thc

Here's a new paper which takes this premise and runs with it as a model of a proton as a bubble made of these planck spherical units https://voat.co/v/holofractal/1540093

d8_thc

Sure! :)

The very important, quantum gravity paper is here http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/1367405491-Haramein342013PRRI3363.pdf

It's actually extremely straightforward (which may be why it's ignored!)

drexhex

I'll refer to d8_thc's comment above https://voat.co/v/Conspiracy/1539372/7493939

xeemee

i think we are re-learning the secrets that were already known by many ancient civilizations before us

i find it interesting that it's being revealed in the field of quantum science - the stuff that's going on in this field is literally mind-blowing

alchemy will again be an accepted science at some point