She went all the way to Syria, toured around reporting; and comes back to do an audio only interview. The evidence she presents is simply "the media lied before, so they are lying now". Fuck off. If that were the only evidence you need then you could "prove" anything you want.

I had it on 2x speed and still couldn't sit through the whole shit interview. It was basically emotional appeals with huge allegations thrown in and no evidence what so ever. Basically "I talked with all these super kind hard working people, who were so nice to me and open and friendly, they would give you the shirt off their backs, they only want their story heard but they are being silenced and tortured and destroyed by evil NATO terrorists"

Oh my fucking God. STFU about the emotional bullshit and present some evidence of the only important thing said.

I believe the US is supporting ISIS. It is obvious from the evidence that has been presented elsewhere, but this lady has nothing but bullshit. All she did was go to Syria and get the opinions of peasants. Not even candid, or honest opinions but the shit they would tell a foreign reporter.

I know a lot of people will want to support her because she is saying what you already believe to be true. And that would be great for a blog, but if you are going to put "journalist" in the tittle you are selling something more.

She should have come back with more.

11 Feb -- so the sentiment stands, but maybe not to be paired up with current reports?