No, a fucking cuckchan user doesn’t know anything.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-18/assange-attorney-provides-out-says-conditions-not-met-assangemanning-extradition-dea

No, it’s just more bullshit to “normalize” trannies.

In all honesty, you're better of waiting to see what the outcome is rather than making conclusions such as that.

I see it terms of a court case. If you go to court and have nothing to offer other than speculation without evidence... your case will be thrown out. Only when there's rock hard evidence can there be any conclusions drawn.

What doesn't make sense to me in this analysis is point 6. If the CIA had somehow usurped control of Wikileaks, why would they retire the organization?

With its good reputation and 100% track record...they could use it as an incredible tool to...

• Find genuine leakers and make sure that real leaks don't get out.
• Mislead the truth community and ethical people who want to expose these criminals. Waste lots of their time and resources on false leads and nonsense.
• Use it as a tool to embarrass and go after their own domestic political enemies when necessary to make an example of somebody.
• Push international propaganda effectively.
• Manipulate public opinion with controlled leaks or even completely fake documents if they wanted.

how do you explain sean hannity interview

I hope they are wrong, but the idea i got from the unexpected "offer" of Assange and the fact that he pretty much disappeared is that they have already got him and now they are fabricating a parallel story about how they got their hands on him. I don't trust Obanana, he proved to be a liar and a disgusting person, if i don't see Assange with my own eyes i won't believe anything they say and even then... he might have been forced to act to support the narrative that CIA and Obanana want us to believe.

I've been yelling this for ages. I think we'll see "Assange" driven away from the embassy in a blacked out car surrounded by police. Then there will be shots of a charter or military plane taking off, then the next we'll see of him is in court.

Assange was vanished most likely on October 16, around the same time all social media accounts of Wikileaks have been taken over. Snce then a chain of better and better fake appearances were published, starting with old footage deceptively labeled as new, then bad quality surprise "live" audio streams to obscure events, finally with tampered cut-and paste jobs of videos (the Pilger interview, the Hannity one and finally a real sneaky "live" video a reddit AMA of him. - getting more and more sophisticated with every step. Since they can't keep it up indefinitely they now construct a plausible story of how Assange ended up in US custody to process and parade him in a kangaroo court before the eyes of the world. I predict death penalty. Conservatives with their superficial love affair with wikileaks will still agree, that he was a cyberterrorist all along, liberals will cheer his demise and take the opportunity to point out that "this is what trump does to his supporters, see?!" And wikileaks will remain as a honeypot for whistleblowers and too curious "tinfoinlhatters".

Another inconvenience to the power structure eliminated and progress will march on in the same direction, with just a slightly different music playing.

I really hope this turns out to be false.

One simple explanation could be, that he is just trying to "keep up to his promises", so commuting Manning's sentence could be used as an example of the transparency/not going after whistleblowers: http://www.alternet.org/glenn-greenwald-remember-when-obama-vowed-protect-whistleblowers

Quite wishful thinking, but have to see how Wikileaks/Assange responds. NSA-data being usable by CIA/FBI etc without warrant seems to be supporting the claim that "Surveillance will reach an unprecented level soon".

Mirror / Archived: 4-Chan user predicts Manning's sentence being commuted last week: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/106894428/