I understood your point. What I was pointing out was that those articles may be a review of what has been studied To date and not meant to support or oppose the new study, just give background. This would mean,they are not a discrepancy.

You may be reading the review of the literature. But I think you are responding to another article. This one is about dirty vaccines, not autism. If you read through you will see they compared rates of autism and other conditions to compare any difference in incidence when they had been vaccinated or not. The only conditions that showed a greater incidence were the Neuro behavior ones. It's only a pilot but it's well done and very pertinent. We have been reading about buried or under reported research findings. Recent CDC whistleblowers. Very scary that Pharma and CDC are probably corrupt.

Your vaccine Podesta email is certainly impressive, thanks! I posted 2 vaccine related articles and ppl keep talking about autism, which was addressed in the other one. This one is exposing contaminated vaccines -all that were tested-- from all current Pharma companies --ALL had contaminants. That is really alarming. They should be pure. The risks are significant and public is uninformed they are consenting for sloppy, dangerous products. You know Vaccine companies cannot be sued. Pretty suspect.

This are all the available ones made by the Pharma companies.

Are you looking at the right article? This one is about contaminants in vaccines, not association with Neuro diseases.

So the guy a few yrs ago, probably 10+yrs ago who put that bogus study about vaccines and autism was just a false flag?

And thinking about it, makes sense, that injection that one lab made to be injected into spinal cords-- how many batches were full of mold and fucked people up who got them.

Also the immunization schedule compared to just 30 yrs ago is 3 or 4x more shots for kids. In addition to new ones. Hpv, chickenpox....etc.

In people's minds these topics are already filed under conspiracy and dismissed. It doesn't matter what new evidence might come to light, it's dismissed before even being looked at.

"Al Qaeda prepared to strike" - how do you respond to that? How are they going to strike? Where? "Shut. Down. Everything." ?

The former... Who exactly is " [email protected] "? Why is her belief significant? The theory behind using thimerosal is not that it's used in "trace amounts" - it's that studies have shown it's not broken down by the body and gets flushed out rapidly. And yeah, it's toxic - it's there as a preservative, to kill bacteria, like any antibiotic. And like any antibiotic, is also toxic to humans.

You know all those perscription drug commercials on all the news networks? That is billions of $s a year to control the content. If people would think about it and connect the dots they would see why the media is corrupt. Perscriptipn drug commercials are illegal everywhere but the USA.

The latter leak implies the administration may have had some vague prior warning - not that it was an inside job.

As for the former leak - I'd really like to see the paper. Thimerosal may be toxic in trace amounts, but how toxic? Cooking food creates toxic, carcinogenic compounds too. Gotta compare apples to apples.

IMO subby's find may be more concerning.