Tancred

I see. The new one seems weak compared to that.

Tancred

I don't remember the original well enough. Did the original give us any info which was new then and has been confirmed by now?

EyeCyou

Sounds Spicy!

followthedolla

i lurk 8ch daily, it has gone a bit downhill too. juiciest threads get locked and/or deleted, for example a great thread about one Roy Cohn was deleted after around 250 redpilling replies, and some great gets for Kek.

senpaithatignoresyou

the problem with working in the shadows, is that you can be blamed for everything. It gets worse when you have a history of unethical behaviors.

What i enjoy about all of this, is that FBI anon did not have to be in the FBI. FBI anon could simply be a foreign agent, whose purpose is to humiliate the US intelligence community by telling the public the truth.

doing so not only causes disruptions, but it also forces the intelligence community to hunt moles, something that they have had to do since snowden.

Tancred

If agents start an information war by making each other's secrets public, I'm all for it.
Everything that would be destroyed by the truth deserves to be destroyed.

Tancred

It is known that 4chan is compromised. Then it begs the question why any TLAnons would post there instead of other places.

murraryrothbard

I always wonder if these are hoax when I read them but it always makes for an interesting read.

Tancred

I always wonder if these are hoax when I read them but it always makes for an interesting read.

That perfectly describes the point of this sub.

peacegnome

When you sign a message it basically takes your private key (a long password that only you have access to) and your message and spits out a new string. Then you can send your message and that string, and people can verify that it was you.

An easy way to do it is through the bitcoin client but there are plenty of other ways as well. As long as the cryptography isn't broken (most aren't, at least that we know of) it is pretty safe to believe it.

peacegnome

is there a reason someone like FBIanon would not want to sign something? so that if he is correct this time people will believe him next time.

Plague1

You think dedicated assholes can't recreate a trip code...? If he uses anything to compromise his identity it can mean death. Any other identifier can be recreated and used maliciously.

Nothing is stopping anyone from"saying" they are FBI anon right now. At least with the lack of identifiers, everything will be critically compared and contrasted with the original texts to verify identify as best as we humanly can. If anything else was used and then compromised, we might not devote the same kind of energy to actually making sure it was the same individual.

peacegnome

signing a message is not a trip code. i'm not sure where i said that a trip code is what he should use, because all of my posts ask about signing the messages. Signing only verifies your identity, it wouldn't "compromise his identity" unless he used a key that was known to be his.

Plague1

A trip code used to be commonly used as a version of a signature on anonymous boards. You seem to be describing something different. I'm not sure if it could be duplicated, or if it's accepted common knowledge that this version of a signature would suffice on an anonymous image board or not. I haven't seen it pop up on 4 or 8chan in the way you're describing though.

DrumpfBTFO

Maybe he has no reason to share anymore information with the public anymore?

There's been some "interviews" with the FBIanon from victus libertas etc for example, but how they managed to contact him or anything?

The original FBIanon said that they have alot of information of alot of sick stuff happening in the government, and within the Clinton Foundation. Some people believed, some did not, but atleast it made people look more closely into the Clinton Foundation, and it played a part in having pizzagate blow up after the podesta-emails. It did have atleast some effect into the election i believe.

If he was indeed right, and that the FBI has the necessary proof to make arrests, but not until Trump is in office etc, then they might not have any more reason to share info to the public.

peacegnome

How can you tell? does fbianon ever sign something?