FreeRebel

"Pull it."

SaveTheChildren

/v/transvestigation

Open your eyes people

God gave you eyes to see, use them.

OKythen

OP missed the point that Larry was SO lucky... He claimes it was TWO separate terrorist attacks so claimed on the insurance twice.

The insurance company said no fucking way!

So he went to court and won on TWO claims!

Lucky huh?

Mylon

Don't forget the part where the WTC needed some very expensive renovations to get rid of the asbestos. Made that insurance payout even better.

Monkstar1

Proofread, and then give it to somebody else to proofread as well.

antiliberalsociety

Where were YOU in 2011 when the towers fell?

NoRagrets

Fast asleep, it was probably like 4 AM here and I had school the next day.
Mum was talking about it in the morning, I had no idea what the towers were back then, I was 14.

Monkstar1

That's interesting. Similar to when JFK was shot, people remember where they were on 9/11 and probably won't ever forget.

antiliberalsociety

Coughs-itwas2001*-coughs

NoRagrets

Oh, now I see it. Yeah the grammar is fucking shocking for a published and circulating meme.

PIcasso54

Larry, Baby

murraryrothbard

You forgot the magical collapse of building 7

Grifter42

Zeitgeist is full of anti-Christian propaganda, and downplays the involvement of Israel in 9/11.

Empire_of_the_mind

here's how "conspiracy" research works: we all know this isn't the entire, correct, true story. the point is it opens their eyes to the fact that whatever the real story, it's fucking clear that the "OFFICIAL STORY" is horse shit. People invariably go do more research and peel the onion back.

Problematic

Is that the one where they claim that Christianity is sun worship because "son" and "sun" are phonetically the same in English, a language that didn't develop until a millennia after the text was written?

ixaxxar

It really had almost nothing to do with the spelling but more so the nature of all the gods worshiped through history that share the same exact traits over and over. The part about the sun was more of saying "gods" in general are in fact worship of the sun.

Grifter42

Yup! That's the one.

Baconmon

You guys remember seeing Zeitgeist movie for the first time?.. holy shit, that was like my first experience in to knowing just how fucking evil our world is.. I was watching it with my girlfriend and best friend.. All 3 of us watched that whole thing in the living room (I had it playing on the TV some how) and were just blown away at all the shit it was revealing..

lukaglobus

and nothing has changed since then :)

cpebach

There are several underlying assumptions at work here: that the World Trade Center must not have had terrorism insurance before Silverstein took over; that selecting such coverage was purely optional; and that because he “chose” to buy such coverage when he did, Silverstein must have known in advance that (and when) terrorists would strike.

It’s important to note that, despite appearances, Silverstein wasn’t actually the sole leaseholder of the World Trade Center. He led a consortium of investors and lenders that included GMAC Commercial Mortgage (a General Motors subsidiary), Westfield America Inc. (a shopping center developer), and real estate investor Lloyd Goldman. All these entities had a voice in deciding how much of insurance coverage the properties would have, and each had some claim on whatever insurance monies were paid out.

Bear in mind, too, that when we speak of “terrorism insurance coverage,” what we’re actually speaking of is coverage that doesn’t have a terrorism exclusion. Such exclusions aren’t uncommon now, but according to the Insurance Information Institute virtually all commercial insurance policies sold in the U.S. before 9/11 covered terrorist incidents as a matter of course (and essentially free of charge), because the risk was considered so remote. Thus, for example, the World Trade Center was fully covered when it was bombed by terrorists in 1993, and insurers paid out an estimated $510 million in damages after that incident. There’s no reason to suppose that the WTC wasn’t routinely covered against terrorist acts right up until the time Silverstein took over the lease in 2001.

Moreover, upon signing that lease, Silverstein was obligated to insure the World Trade Center. There was nothing strange, suspicious, or “fortuitous,” therefore, about his purchasing an all-risk insurance policy — which at that time would have automatically included terrorism coverage — two months before 9/11, because that’s when he became contractually responsible for doing so. Ultimately, Silverstein wasn’t even solely responsible for the total dollar amount of that coverage — $3.55 billion — because that was the minimum demanded by his lenders, according to a 2002 report in The American Lawyer.

It’s a fact that Silverstein took his insurers to court after 9/11 and asked for double the damages. It’s also a fact that he did so on the grounds that there were two attacks (or, in insurance lingo, “occurrences”), not one. But this wasn’t some premeditated scam based on foreknowledge that a terrorist attack involving two planes would occur. The projected cost of rebuilding the World Trade Center, which in 2004 was estimated at $9 billion, made Silverstein’s court strategy a virtual necessity. Plus, he had obligations to lenders and co-investors, and still owed lease payments of $10 million per month to the Port Authority.

The court ultimately did grant Silverstein a payout of $4.55 billion, which amounted to about a third more than the maximum allowable for a single “occurrence” by his insurance policy, but significantly less than the $7.1 billion he had originally hoped for.

FreeRebel

Awwwww, Poor Lucky Larry! That makes it allllllll right.

ConservativeDev

This is from Snopes.

Pepper-theDoctor

(((snopes)))

cpebach

Yes it is. And it explains why the "Silverstein let 9/11 happen to cash in on the insurance" theory is crap. With evidence you can examine if you were motivated to do so.

Or you can just assume that Snopes.com is in on the conspiracy too. Good luck with that.

1moar

Thank you.

VoutGuy

Ah, if only we had memes back then to make the masses woke.

cyks

Unfortunately for the early 2000s, memes were only as strong as steel beams.

GuannaRue

Hey, it could happen...

SaveTheChildren

clock the adams apple on the tranny on the right

bruinsdude

Did a 5 year old write this?

Baconmon

It is meant to be written in a condescending way as if the writer is humoring the official story and pretending that the official story can not possibly be wrong, in order to point out how suspicious all of these points are together..