Jimmycog

Old news. All of the civil war photographer staged bodies. Just like CNN.

adamsnapple

Gave examples of admitted fakes at the beginning. Then gets into never admitted evidence. If it's old news please enlighten the rest of the people cause literally next to no one believes it.

Jimmycog

It was years ago. The Smithsonian museum was showing how they were faking the battlefield or setting up the battlefield for the pictures. The type of glass plate emulsions took a bit of time to make a good picture. They made a lot of it up. By today's standards it would all be considered fake.

adamsnapple

Nice didn't know that I'll definitely look into it. That's amazing. I don't believe anyone died do you? Supposedly 10s of thousands of deaths in each battle and nearly no bodies that look real. Used dummies too. You think they used fake dummies does the Smithsonian admit that?

Jimmycog

I don't think the photographic evidence proves the mass carnage claimed. In a war some casualties happened, but they were lighter than claimed. There is always propaganda associated with these events. As in all wars we will never know the facts let a lone the truth.

adamsnapple

It is nice to hear anything other than "you are crazy", "retarded", etc., I have found a couple sites since mentioning it. but hear me out. If they could fake anything they wanted isn't it possible it was all completely staged. What about this photo of Lincoln. Just a man in a mask. m y take is Lincoln was either a character from the start never real, or he died and they just played like he was still alive, then staged his assassination literally on stage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?spfreload=10&v=k8ClMNgFCdQ&app=desktop it was the actual photo for the penny.