Regardless of Dotcom's info, Assange basically admitted Seth Rich was the source of the DNC leaks by nodding his head yes when asked. Both Assange and Dotcom strike me as genuine unlike the corporate liar media. My money is still on Seth Rich being the source.

point 11:

It is alleged that Mr Rich's email account received a verification email from mega.nz. That may be so. But that does not mean that any attempt was made to hack his email account. Literally anyone could have gone to Mega.nz and registered an account there using Mr Rich's gmail address, which was publicly known. That would then have resulted in Mega sending a verification email to that address. If someone had registered Mr Rich's email at Dropbox for example, Dropbox would likewise have sent a confirmation link. That has nothing to do with hacking.

sounds like someone's trying to plant 'evidence' on this guy. he was smart to seek counsel.

https://archive.is/7Q3bi | :

Kim Dotcom: An open letter to Seth Rich's family regarding hacking claims

"According to experts and Rich's family, the emailed invitation from [email protected] appeared to be an attempt to gain access to Rich's email.", "There is no credible basis in fact to link me to any attempted hacking of Mr Rich's email.", "The clear inference the reader is invited to draw from the above is that I attempted to hack Mr Rich's email account.", "If someone had registered Mr Rich's email at Dropbox for example, Dropbox would likewise have sent a confirmation link.", "It is alleged that Mr Rich's email account received a verification email from mega.nz."

This has been an automated message.