QuestionEverything

STORY CONFIRMATIONS are coming in.

Background checks pending.. Seems to be CIA. Seems to be exlposive .engi bkgrnd.

Location checks pending.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALq3ewgaKE0

SEEMS LEGIT SO FAR.

Barry Jennings story matches: He was murdered. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nO9Tsigk5fc

“When you want to find out who is behind something, just follow the money. Look at the trades made just before 9/11. These are the guys that knew what was coming. The sons of CIA agents, government officials. Close relatives of the most powerful men in America. Cheney, Rumsfeld. They all got rich. It wasn’t just the contracts awarded to their friends in the construction business and the wars and the kickbacks.”

“It was insider trading.”

(All insider trading was classified, then deleted (patently illegal)).

SayTan

That source is less reliable than the weekly world news. They also have a page about Kubrick faking the moon landings.

GlobalSouth

Virtually everything posted from this domain is out and out bullshit:

https://voat.co/domains/yournewswire.com

GumbyTM

So if crazy old guys confessing is evidence, the Holocaust totally happened exactly as described.

Cantilever

Video or BS.

tanukihat

Anyone who believes this is basically covering up for radical Islamist terrorism.

ScottRockview

Shalom. I see you're fighting the good fight to make sure the shekels you spent to use Muslims to fly planes into buildings is not wasted by having people know the truth.

UlyssesEMcGill

Did radical islamic terrorist plant bombs in Tower 7? Because it was not hit by a plane, and the "fire-caused-collapse" is implausible.

tanukihat

implausible

Because you want to apologize for radical Islam, you choose not to believe it.

trucking_foal

go shill somewhere else. 9/11 had almost nothing to do with radical islam. Anyone who believes that is either living in denial, or being paid by someone.

UlyssesEMcGill

No, but the "official/scientific" explanation for the implosion of Tower 7 is impossible.

soggywaffles

Yeah because there's no way a government could possibly use tools at hand, such as Islam, to accomplish their goals

tanukihat

Guns don't kill people.

gosso920

Damn dirty apes on horseback do!

GoBackToReddit

Gave no new information. It's nothing.

E: I'd like to see information on this Malcom Howard fellow. Any source of that picture ?

I find it interesting that the "story" gives a name but the wrist band looks to have been blurred. I would have liked to find out the hospital name.

9836691?

I am so tired of old conspiracy theories. How about one where the steel is dissolving ? Yeah, that's it, they melted .

9836636?

Give me this old fart on video talking to a semi-reputable journalist, or at least an infotainment personality. No other source for this that I can find, other than a shitty youtube video that is obviously referencing this article. Is there an open-source AI yet that can sift out disinformation?

eyeVoated

No, but there's one that can sift out truth.

Tancred

Aha, yesterday it was a MI5 agent who killed Diana, today it's a CIA agent who blew up WTC7, what's next?

Seems like they found a convenient unconfirmable story to mine clicks from conspiracy fans.

Unreasonable

Name once "conspiracy theory" that has turned out to be completely provably false?

Go ahead, I'm waiting.

Tancred

The thing is that this one cannot be proven false.

There are false conspiracy theories, put out by CIA to poison the well. E.g. Chemtrails

Unreasonable

Lol. I use chemtrails to test peoples ability to handle reality even when it is difficult to accept.

You must be one of the people I feel sorry for, for not being able to accept reality.

Tancred

Nomen est omen

9845639?

Flat earth is all I can think of (balloon + camera + wifi = youtube debunking). But you're point is very well taken, and in fact very well proven

https://www.reddit.com/r/TruthLeaks/wiki/locc2

srgmpdns

Yournewswire is my favorite source for stories about Bigfoot and the Illuminati.