Mostly an inordinate amount of trivia that paints a complicated and incomplete narrative mostly useful for just showing normies how ignorant they are of the subject. Most people don't even know what the NIST report claims happened, so these normies can hardly defend the 9/11 "official story" when they don't even know what it is. I've heard people say all kinds of crazy bullshit trying to explain how the towers collapsed without explosives, and none of it has ever conformed to what the official NIST report actually claims, and which their own "calibration" tests debunked. They did in-lab experiments that debunked their hypothesis immediately so they just claimed that these were calibrations for a computer model, and then kept cranking up variables in the model until they got an instantaneous state that they liked and then stopped the simulation, calling it a day, and said that everything that happened after the collapse "initiation" (ie the entire kinetic part of the collapse) was beyond the scope of their study, and therefore they didn't even study it.

One of the things I found the most interesting is that the Port Authority convened experts on controlled demolition, chemical warfare, and the buildings' original engineers to discuss what terrorists might potential due to destroy the towers all the way back in 1984. They were told already at that time of the possibilities of both basement bombs and flying planes into the buildings, among other ideas, but were told by the engineers that none of these things would be likely to actually collapse the buildings, including multiple plane impacts. I find it very coincidental that the very things that the experts called together to discuss ended up happening, both the basement bombing and then 9/11. I suspect the people who organized this meeting were in fact brainstorming for what they were going to do in the future.

http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a011784caramreport

911 became the national emergency number around the same time that planning/construction for the WTC Towers began. Another interesting coincidence.

The AP reported about 10 years ago that one of the non-government structural engineers working on the FEMA BPAT group (a Professor Astaneh-Asl) had been modeling the impacts and fires for years in computer simulations and had come to the conclusion that not only the WTC Towers, but ALL skyscrapers in NYC which were up to code could withstand the same impacts and fires. Dr. Astaneh-Asl accused those in charge of the FEMA report of trying to cover up what he assumed was shoddy construction that failed to meet NYC code, noting that the wife of one of the original engineers was also on the team. The same article also brought up questions about the levees that failed during Hurricane Katrina. This whole article got memory holed by Google in no time.

Another interesting tidbit: the cores of both towers were apparently encased in a concrete wall rather than the gypsum/drywall claimed, which was completely removed from the diagrams and information on the structural design in the FEMA and NIST reports. In some collapse photos you can clearly see portions of the concrete box around the core still standing after the perimeter columns had fallen.

The original structural documentation for the buildings was also apparently de facto classified, understandable from a counter-terrorism perspective, but even after the buildings were totally destroyed they still never released that documentation, only select and incomplete portions of structures convenient for NIST and FEMA's contradictory hypotheses. I think they finally were able to get more complete documentation for WTC7 which completely damned NIST's WTC7 report.

I could sit here all evening typing out shit but it just reminds me of the futility of making the case online when the chances of reopening the investigation right now are unlikely. Better than they were under Obama or Bush, but still unlikely for the moment.

JEWS DID 911

Look up 911 MISSING LINKS