The recent drama was a test to see how quicky voat would turn on an innocent man.

The recent drama was a test to see how quicky voat would turn on an innocent man. ( conspiracy )

submitted 2017-08-25T06:00 by Kal

9 comments

clamhurt_legbeard 2017-08-25T06:28

He removed comments that hurt his feelings. That's not innocent

If I rob a bank to "test" how long before the police get there, I still get put into prison.

On the plus side, he removed the feelings rule and unbanned me, so that's nice.

link

matthew-- 2017-08-25T06:04

No.

We can see what he has written and done. His "innocence" isn't in question at all.

The evidence shows that he abused his power by banning shit that he didn't like, then made up rules to justify what he did.

Moderators are there to remove spam, not opinions.

link

rocket_robin_hood 2017-08-25T07:03

Evidence? I've been asking for evidence since this shit started. Do you have any evidence he's been abusing his power?

link

matthew-- 2017-08-25T08:28

https://voat.co/v/Conspiracy/modlog/comment

https://voat.co/v/Conspiracy/modlog/submission

See for yourself. It's not that hard.

link

rocket_robin_hood 2017-08-25T09:22

Thats laughable, as I've said over and over a mod enforcing the subs rules is not an abuse of power.

link

matthew-- 2017-08-25T11:31

You are an idiot.

link

rocket_robin_hood 2017-08-25T16:49

Evidence or stfu.

link

matthew-- 2017-08-26T02:01

I already did you stupid fag.

link

rocket_robin_hood 2017-08-26T17:56

Your gonna need to do better than that if you want to accuse someone of abusing their power, making up rules, and banning stuff that he didnt like. I'd like quotes or links to where you see him doing any of these things. I've been over the logs and I have not seen anything to be concerned about.

link