neomadic

No mention of doppler effect due to strafing, the amplification from the concert PA, or rate of fire being equal to an M240. No mention of comparing shot intervals between the pavement "slaps" and reports. He missed a lot of basic stuff that would have to be taken into consideration to get an accurate theory.

psioniq

Not shilling, but I think it was 'sorta' disproved by the fact that bullets were being sprayed everywhere.

Some would hit close by (with matching reports from shooting from MB), others would land further away from the device capturing the audio, thus adding/subtracting a few extra miliseconds to the report.

Or, you know - maybe there were more shooters.

pby1000

An echo will not have a report, right?

redolas

Maybe it was taken down because it's a Reeeeeeepost????

It's NOT a NEW video, it's been available soon after the shooting and you can find it everywhere. Here is the original .

And here is one claiming to prove multiple shooters .

Btw. it's not a separate gun, you are hearing the bullets ricochet on the ground. But let's say they're right. In that case, were was the second shooter hiding? Where was he shooting from?

They're not concerned about that, because all they do is copy content, put it in a frame and claim it theirs. And when youtube deletes them, they cry their eyes out. Please.

Thegreatestname

Something people seem to fail to realize. The gun makes a bang when it's fired(obviously) but, the projectile also makes it's own noise as it breaks the sound barrier through the air.

Here's a couple examples. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stzSY1gT0m0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSfoJkAq--k

Notice how similar it sounds to the alleged second shooter.. The only way to tell from this video is there is truly a second shooter is to count the muzzle reports and compare them with the other higher pitched "second shooter" to see if they match up noise for noise.

Thegreatestname

Exactly what part of it is fake news? Super sonic things traveling in the atmosphere make a noise.

https://youtu.be/Rb4BP7lZnk0?t=313

teatime

But I thought all YouTube commentators were vetted for their scientific reasoning skills and journalistic integrity?!

Rifle

Bannd on Youtube and Reddit!

Has no significance.

Ho-Lee-Fuk

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=JxmEFeKy8aI this one is the most infinitely hardcore truthy truth of all.

peacegnome

It doesn't change his analysis, but i think that the snap is the mach cone, and not the "hitting the pavement". Also, if there were different rounds (slower/heavier) then it would account for this coming from 1 shooter.

Baconmon

This is NOT AN ECHO and it is NOT BULLETS RICHCHETING because:
1: First of all the gun doesn't echo every time, so it can't be an echo..
2: The guns sound different..
3: There are parts where the other gun fires first, so it can't be ricocheting bullets..
4: Every person there swears 100% that there were definitely more than 1 gunmen..
WE ARE BEING LIED TO

In Sargon's dissection of the Las Vegas shooting (Part 1), he shows some REALLY INTERESTING footage from TWO different hotels (bellagio and caeser's palace I think) where people in the hotel were running around panicking about a shooter, even though these hotels were FAR away from the mandaylay bay hotel, and even though the mandaylay bay shooting had stopped for 45 minutes already before these other hotels panicked..
Yet the official narrative and the MSM decides to NEVER MENTION either of these hotels or explain what was happening in them.. It is literally just down the memory hole, like it never happened, and no explanation what so ever.. It is a good video to watch on it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/f3y8924sKZI

counterjihad

What if doctored audio is being released that suggests 2 shooters to throw people off the trail? Nobody can answer why you would bother with 2 shooters when there is such a massive gap between bursts. It seems that killing wasn't maximised by a guy who aimed to maximize killing. Why the big gaps between bursts. That doesn't make sense

redolas

A ricochet is not an echo, and it's not the sound gases make when exiting the barrel. A ricochet is a different sound .

CantBuySkills

Damn... there have been a lot of these "multiple shooter" claims/videos and I personally have found them easily explained by echoes from the buildings... but this one... this is different, these are not echoes and they clearly came from much closer to the crowd than from the Mandalay bay 32nd floor... hmmmmmmm 🤔

Not sure what, but there is definitely something 🐠🐠🐠 about this.

dan_k

ground floor+ 1st floor+ 2nd floor... = 33rd floor

ravensedgesom

definitely multiple shooters I also have seen footage that people in the audience were people hit by sniper fire before being hit by automatic fire. Also why in would they turn the lights on from the stage? I recently learned that there was a helicopter nearby which adds further questions to the exact details.

FedupOtaku

Fuck you for your 100% proof comment. 100% proof my fucking ass, it's called an echo holy shit.

Still shouldn't be banned on youtube, but that is life now. We need an alternative and for youtube to die.

Ho-Lee-Fuk

Forensic acoustic proof of SECOND shooter in the Las Vegas massacre

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=JxmEFeKy8aI

Poot_McGarvey

You are either a shill or a moron.

Awful-Falafel

Great video, just showing the evidence w/o stupid ranting commentary.

JesusRules

Sounds like two guns, could the shooter fire two rifles at once?

literally-white

no, you have to aim a gun to do anything

Mickey_Goldfinch

It sounds like one shooter is way closer than the other.

totes_magotes

No. These are bump stocks, right? You need to have a second hand on the gun to have any degree of accuracy since the whole gun is moving back and forth as well as any other recoil movement (like up, right, etc)

Wil

I agree with the analysis of bump stocks, but do we even know which of the 30 (?) guns were used? What caliber? Were they guns equipped with bump stocks?

goatsandbros

This, except a bump-stock actually physically needs two arms to even work. It's just how they function: the forward arm acts like a spring, to move the rifle forward and against the trigger finger, to fire.

3TrillionPotatoes

Are you implying the shooter was going full Rambo?

I don't think it'd be impossible but considering how much they appear to try to be covering this up/attacking dissent I'm going to say there were at least two shooters.

birthdaysuit11

Sorry for the crap link, it was censored everywhere. Please, archive!