psioniq

Isn't this pretty normal if the trees were struck by lightning?

Greenzero86

I thought it was directed energy weaponry. Or is that the disinformation?

FeminismKills

Didn't ISIS issue orders last year to "burn California to the ground"? I remember hearing that somewhere. That and Muslims don't drink alcohol. Just spitballing here but I think it could be Muslims.

OhRutherfordBehave

As in a microwave that can be controlled by an external entity?

Unreasonable

Yup. Been saying this shit for a long time. Cell phone towers, especially 5G, are "death ray" towers that can already target individuals out of a crowd. Imagine, protests will end when people spontaneously combust for attending them.

Gravspeed

Um... No. 5ghz doesn't heat things up quite like 2.4, 2.4 reacts with water which is why we use it to cook, but with 700+ watts of power. Even licensed band microwave dishes are limited to 5-50 watts depending. Not too mention that those dishes are fixed mount. If they could catch things on fire every cell site would be constantly on fire.

Unreasonable

5 ghz is double the 2.4 ghz frequencies, being a resonant frequency, it sure as shit interacts with water. Also, you're believing the official "cell phones don't cause cancer" people?

Gravspeed

What they call 5ghz is actually 5.8 and it is not resonant. Cell phones probably do cause cancer though.

peacegnome

so how are they aiming these? if there were servos or something then we could simply take pictures of them. microwave antennas can be directional, but that doesn't make much sense for cellular service, and so if verizon was putting them in for anything other than communication to another verizon tower/building, then we would be on to something.

If it is not directional then it is dissipating like 1/r (i'm being nice here and saying that goes out as a perfectly flat disk), meaning that objects that are 0.1mi away get 10x the exposure as ones 1mi away.

Microwave is often used as a remote link, rural houses will sometimes even use it if they have line of sight with an isp. It would make more sense (since cell phones can't use microwave) that they brought a temp tower that linked to their network via microwave and to the users using the normal tech,

Unreasonable

You can use a microwave receiver to measure the amount being emitted. I have and it's generally way above their own safety regulations. The first "research" done on microwaves was in WW2 when the sailors would stick their junk in front of the radar emitters so they could have unprotected sex and not have any children. If soldiers knew this then, don't you think researchers know it now?

Men will have their phone in their pocket. Right next to their nuts. This is causing male infertility rates to skyrocket.

Other things have to do with constructive and destructive microwave interference. They have the ability to "inject" feelings into people, make them feel afraid or scared, and they're figuring out how to directly manipulate peoples thoughts. The feelings they've pretty much got in the bag. By triangulating antennas they will be able to focus the microwaves, pick one person out of a crowd, influence them, put thoughts in their mind, or just simply have their brain fry and kill 'em on the spot.

Feel safer?

peacegnome

okay, a few things. The soldiers were using an always on radio that is pretty strong. the phone in your pocket is less than 0.5W and most likely much less than that; AND is transmitting a very small portion of the time. The antenna is also omni-directional, so even if you had your balls squashed up against the entire antenna it would still only get half of the power. omni-directional goes like 1/r^2 so the falloff is quick and even at 10cm 4cm^2 is only 4cm2/(4pi 100cm2) or 1%, that's assuming your balls have a cross section of 4cm, anyway big difference, and they shouldn't be compared.

I haven't read about the mind control aspects, so i have nothing to add there.

you can not do "directional by triangulation" by using a antenna that goes every direction. using one that goes only one direction would hit a single target, but then why use multiple. you could do some control with interference, but it wouldn't be like you are imagining it.

Unreasonable

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3ge9M54l7E

If you can cook an egg you can cook your balls.

It wouldn't be like you were imagining it to yourself, to everyone else though.... well.... voices in your head.

Doorsopenm8

What if spontaneous combustion was a ploy to make people think it could happen without an outside stimulant. Watch "spontaneous combustion" be the new suecide.