pitenius

This is intentional. They're trying to make a case that Trump is a fiscal failure. (There were early positive reports, but I can't make an assessment with any certainty.) The number has been chosen as emotional charged for those which the WSJ has determined to be his base -- right wing religious folks. I think they've misplayed their hand here -- Trump was not the "religion" candidate. His supporters are more prone to chuckle at 666. Think about it: 666 billion? How can we be certain it wasn't 663? Like astronomical distances, astronomical finance is part guesswork. The fact that it devolved to a trigger number is telling.

used2likepizza

also they use the number 33 later in the article....It's comical

IIJOSEPHXII

We have reduced Satan to a humourless troll

derram

https://archive.fo/BCGmU | https://files.catbox.moe/vzfs7k.png :

U.S. Ran $666 Billion Deficit In Fiscal 2017, Sixth Highest on Record - WSJ

This has been an automated message.

Jungun

The nigger rich US government borrowing money off China with the shit they stole from you as collateral.

used2likepizza

The article itself has some more amusing numbers in it too......if this number stuff isn't real (not sure) then they sure do like messing with "conspiracy" people.

codegoat

It's real. They have certain numbers they love to mark things with. There is the number 11, that means death or rebirth. There is the number 8, that is the number of corners on a cube and shows you can transcend the problem you are faced with. Going from two-dimensional to three to four etc. Then there is the number 1947/1946, especially in their (sadly) jew-censored wikipedia you'll see it, because the Cocaine Importing Agency and pedo-Tavistock was born in those years etc.

Pattern recognition is one thing I know.

used2likepizza

I thought 666 and then later 33 was so obvious it was LOL