nameof

Could that be why Laura Silsby convicted kidnapper/human trafficker in Haiti now is vp at Alertsense..? AmberAlerts. An asset?

Runaway-White-Slave

Most of the "Churches" these days are spy-shops for local if not regional and national government... The Catholic "church" probably worst of all.

And nowadays they've got about every church they can signed up to assist our Babylonian government with " Clergy Response Teams "...

KeksMex

This was 1973. Today the CIA owns the media completely.

Fetalpig

the entire world knows this- why there are so many of our "journalists" are in prisons-and NGO's as well.

wellendowedduckling

This release is like Christmas for conspiracy theorist like myself :)

Korinthian

imgur is for feds

solvire

kiddie porn is for feds

What_was_that_2

Anderson Cooper, worked for the CIA before CNN, coincidence I think not.

ardvarcus

When they say "the CIA employs" does that mean they get money? If so, how much?

solvire

hehe. Some people are afforded for very little. Some people make ungodly amounts of money. It is like real life but in the shadows, the ability to make deals can be far more lucrative. Meaning work 5 years and then retire.

I know contractors.

thrushlimberger

So little that they will screech at you for half an hour if you don't tip at one of their false front restaurants. The CIA are like those little old ladies with change purses that hold up lines in grocery stores. The day old muffins were good.

KikeFree

It makes sense that CNN is owned lock stock and barrel by the CIA, just so they don't have to overpay for the same lackeys.

kryptoniankoffee

Oddly enough, the first time I heard this was from Alex Jones years ago.

BurninEpix

That was probably right before he was completely coopted by any of the of the many shadow-ey forces of the world. While Alex Jones still to this day DOES drop plenty of truth, the disinfo (no matter how small) that ALWAYS gets mixed in poisons the message... almost all the time. Definitely every time it's actual world impacting information at least.

It makes me wonder sometimes, how some people who are just so sure of themselves and are convinced that they are fully awake and can't tell them anything, will show their true level of knowledge by comimg to the defense of Alex Jones. Think for a minute (not OP necessarily), how is it that Google/YouTube and all the other internet behemoths always censor & beat down any attempt at disseminating truth that begins to gain any traction or wide spread audience, yet somehow Infowars is allowed to grow and expand to the point that it's currently at now(a bonafide giant corporation/brand). Allowed to have it's radio show syndicated across the country. Allowed to make MSM appearances. It's not a coincidence guys.

Compare that to WikiLeaks - an actual legit information source (at least until assange was possibly taken out and/or replaced/co-opted), that has an iron-clad track record to back it up, yet they have been getting attacked and undermined for years and years ever since they started dumping all the classified info on the middle eastern wars. Then, once the podesta dump started, it has been an endless constant assault with over the top disinfo and slander as to what their mission really is. The multiple attempts to frame him for rape and other unsavory acts...

IMO, it all becomes perfectly clear that the one that says dumb and inaccurate shit all the time is allowed to thrive meanwhile the one with an impeccable track record is beat down to no end. It is pretty obvious to me at least which one has the backing of the deep state and which one is considered a legit threat. It's a no brainier guys.