madmalloy

There are no climate deniers.

Ask anyone if the climate changes.

The argument is about the reality of AGW.

It isn't what's causing climate change, it's about money.

Go fig.

FatPepe

Yep, seems like something that more than likely happened. It's good business, why not fund the deniers for as long as you think you'll get away with it. It's a long term investment that extends their company's life.

brother_tempus

Climate Change is a hoax -

Source : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html

Source : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11367272/Climategate-the-sequel-How-we-are-STILL-being-tricked-with-flawed-data-on-global-warming.html

The hard data from NASA [ http://data.remss.com/msu/monthly_time_series/rss_monthly_msu_amsu_channel_c10_anomalies_land_and_ocean_v03_3.txt ],

the NOAA [ ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/hcn/ ],

and The Met [ http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/ ]shows no warming for almost 2 decades.

You can either believe the evidence shown in the hard data or the propaganda by state agents looking for more stolen taxpayer money

Time to put this "theory" on the same shelf as Intelligent Design

blackmadonna

There is more evidence supporting climate change than denying it. State agents make more money off of fossil fuels than they do off clean energy. Think about all of the taxes the government brings in from taxes through dirty industry.

brother_tempus

There is more evidence supporting climate change than denying it.

The data I sourced says different than your ubnsourced opinion

samtrovaum

No, there isn't.

blackmadonna

You're saying the thousands of scientific reports that support climate change are outweighed but the hundred of so that disprove it? That's absurd.