Oh_Well_ian

Let's get this story straight.... A guy without a car probably has no house and therefor, no internet. Probably has no cash and no phone because he is hitchhiking. What does he know and who is he talking to that could make it an urgent mission of dark hats to take him out? Let's just pretend he has crucial information. So... do you pick up the guy ( ya, know.. because he is fucking hitchhiking ) and kill him quietly out of view, or do you run him down in broad daylight with your Camaro in full view of witnesses? By the way, if I'm a hitman, I ain't denting my fucking Camaro on a 50/50 chance of killing a guy with it AND risking my plates are seen. LET'S ALL WAKE THE FUCK UP, OK?

o0shad0o

When you say "survivor", do you mean someone who was injured in the attack, or someone who was there?

If just someone who was there, how many people were in that crowd? What would be normal statistics for a crowd that size?

iDontShift

if the number is up to 5 .. and i have not researched this.. but if it is.. then it is seriously a statistical impossibility ... there just aren't that many hit and runs.

this points to people that could talk about something, or perhaps showed signs of breaking down. it was a false flag / fake event, we know that... so perhaps all these people started talking to someone.

rarepeeks

At the rate these people are dying it makes me say (((WTF?)))

Oh_Well_ian

stop spamming this story..

maybe take 5 minutes to critically think about how implausible the entire narrative is...

iDontShift

one died suddenly after giving statement exposing multiple shooters.

i'm sure it is just an accident /s

rarepeeks

maybe take 5 minutes to critically think about how implausible the entire narrative is...

It says five people have been violently killed that were witnesses. Its accurate. The rest is only you making up stuff and shitting up everybodys day.

PraiseIPU

Only 19,988 more to go!