iDontShift

if you watch the tides, they don't seem to be affected by the moons gravity.

also why don't tides affect large lakes?

Dsonophorus

I agree, the phenomenon can be completely explained by atmospheric thermal refraction.

The interesting bit is jewtube taking the channel down. Assuming it is not a glitch, perhaps the demographic of viewers is the real reason, or perhaps they are preemptively taking it down because it too reliably logs & disseminates space/moon events and that threatens a mil project.

Daniel108

NASA and other departments associated with astronomical evidence have long been engaged in hiding the truth. Richard Hoagland, astronaut Edgar Mitchell and a host of others have been doing their bests to share the truth of what's really been discovered on the Moon, Mars and elsewhere in our solar system.

SynapticRevolt

Holy Shit! The moon is a sports stadium!

un1ty

I remember seeing this when it first was recorded, though not by this YouTuber. I swear it was another guy who watched space debris and was absolutely certain it was spacecraft. Now I'll have to find it...

Wargasm

This is so stupid.

The telescope is earth-based--meaning that light reflected from the moon has to pass through earth's atmosphere. What you are seeing are density differences in earth's atmosphere that you can only notice because they're passing in front of the light from the moon. You know when the weather man on TV talks about a "cold front"? Same kind of thing. In fact, I bet you've seen this before and didn't realize what you were looking at: It's the exact same kind of phenomena that occurs on heated pavement only higher up and on a larger scale.

englishwebster

in a straight line?

Wargasm

I'm trying to think of a good way to explain it, but yeah.

When you open your fridge you won't notice the light bend because there's not enough air between your eye and the food in your fridge even though the light is diffracting a little bit.

When you have miles and miles of something diffracting a little bit you notice the diffraction.

Also when you are miles and miles away from something, little deviations in horizontal position aren't noticible--think of looking at a mountain while driving and how it looks like the mountain is staying still even though you know that you are moving.

Finally, you know from personal experience that pockets of different temperature air don't immediately diffuse and average out, if you've ever opened your front door in the winter or have used an oven.

Combine these three things and you get what appears to be a straight line.

un1ty

How long does light take to reach us being reflected off the moon?

Wargasm

That would be approximately (distance to the moon) /c.

So about (380E6 m)/(3E8 m/s) is 1.3 seconds.

qwop

Agree. Stupid videos like this are how things like the flat earth movement starts. People think they have discovered something unique, when they fail to understand basic science. Occam's Razor says the most likely explanation is exactly what you said. It's the reason we put telescopes into space.

iDontShift

no, it is because gyroscopes don't move. consider that gyroscope maintain a plane, yet we are on a rotating planet, they should rotate every 24 hours, we should be able to identify the wobble as well, by using it. but they don't move.

the suez canal is 100 miles of completely flat, level water.. connecting to oceans. the curve of the earth is absent. impossible. it must be at least 80 feet drop, and that drop would appear in water, of all things, because it always seeks its level.

nasa is a fraud. google 'wagging the moon doggie' .. for non-video evidence of what was politically happening during the moon missions. they were used to cover shit up. video evidence, if you have time is very damning. all photographs we have of the globe are composites, others obvious fakes with copy-pasta clouds.

Occam's Razor says the most likely explanation is exactly what you said

that must be in the schill handbook or you've been indoctrinated by something you've read.

i'll be the first to tell you there are TONS of lies around what the flat earth people are saying... they set up strawmen and beat them down.

qwop

All airplane gyroscopes are self-leveling. Therefore what you just described simply doesn't happen.

Research self-leveling gyroscopes for yourself and see. Because they are self-leveling, they will always point down, even if the earth rotates. That's how they are designed to work. It's for the safety of commercial flight, and is a basic design principle of all aircraft gyroscopes.

Why didn't the flat earth movement explain this to you?

iDontShift

talked to pilots of small planes. they don't point their nose down to maintain a level plane.

Research self-leveling gyroscopes for yourself and see.

i did, they are black boxes. people have taken gyroscopes onto planes and they stay level.

Why didn't the flat earth experts explain this to you?

because it wasn't true. thanks for you comments.

qwop

They are not black boxes unless you open them up. Like this guy did. Here's proof of their self-leveling mechanism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbqcT05YWeo

If you watch his channel, there are multiple videos explaining the inner workings of that device. So yes: they are self-leveling. It's not a conspiracy, it's reality. The flat earthers are lying to you.

iDontShift

i know it is hard, but what part of talked to pilots that fly small planes and them not needing to adjust nose down to maintain altitude did you miss?

of course the black box appears to have leveling mechanism, doesnt mean it does shit.

a conspiracy this big isnt going to be cracked like that.

so far the cherry picking of how you interprete my responses just proves you ignore facts and seek confirmation from liars willing to give you more lies.

again, talked to real pilots that say pointing the nose down to maintain altitude doesnt happen, and no the black box isnt doing it for them... that isnt how it would work even if it worked.. it is just another lie.

crashing_this_thread

HAARP? The interference might only be visible with a textured background. Which creates the illusion of it only being over the moon. When it doesn't really have anything to do with the moon, just some kind of electromagnetic interference.

qwop

Atmospheric disturbance. The guy is filming the moon through approximately 100 km (~60miles) of air. Temperature variations in the air changes its density, and therefore the refractive index. Simply a cold front moving in front of the telescope, or the leftover turbulence of an airliner, or anything that brings warm or cold air into this 100km air column, will bend the light through it.

This is why astronomers prefer telescopes to be high in the mountains, or even better; in space.

crashing_this_thread

Yeah, I'm not ruling that out either. Jumping straight to "the moon is a hologram" is pretty ridiculous.

TendiesHitTheFloor

I was thinking the same thing. It's actually something happening in our atmosphere.

heuristic

Its been filmed around 30 time apparently. Same glitch in all of them. others have checked the math on the telescope panning as the glitch is traversing the recorded screen and this glitch maintains its position in space (with respect to the movement,) pretty much eliminating possibility of equipment malfunction.

totes_magotes

others have checked the math

[citation needed]

UlyssesEMcGill

Can you elaborate?