I have to agree with you. And with having at least 2-3 accounts that support misrepresented information, they have the opportunity to manipulate the current system to increase those numbers unless someone can do investigating into their posting history and see that they are only self-supporting their story, and with no contribution in a fair unbiased manner. A system itself is a mechanical guideline after all and I believe that there should be some form of recognizing the actions to other users so that they refuse to support any misrepresentations. The community isnt as large or active, but with those who do maintain visits often, I think it will be enough to prevent biased content from murking the waters of Whoa.

why is this even getting upvoted? It is approached like a heavily religous follower explaining reasons why LGBT community are 'going to hell'.

EDIT: Upon further inspection of the user, it is clear that they have a biased agenda to spread content fitting towards what I would only imagine is their version of the truth.

Anyone who has any sense in their mind obviously would see through this and puts no divide between any other person because they understand the core values of critical thinking.