blackguard19

More accurately, it's the specific type of false flag known as a hoax.

Oh_Well_ian

Do you follow Q ? On 1/27, he clearly predicted a major false flag was incoming to change the narrative that was trending very unfavorably away from Mueller's witch hunt.

Gringojones

Non lawyer here. Need some help understanding why this paper is important.

cyclops1771

This is a motion to protect the governing of discovery - i.e. information/evidence. Basically, this is sealing any evidence found from public view - making it outside an FOIA request.

It is making all the evidence in this case confidential.

Gringojones

Would it be available in the future after trials or whatever are over? Does this mean that if they look at a document, claiming it's evidence, it becomes classified and pulled from public view? I'm trying to wrap my head around it.

cyclops1771

Generally, no - it will not be available after the trial is over. You are correct - anything entered as evidence becomes protected from public view. It would take a Wikileaks type situation to make it public, even after the trial.

Gringojones

That makes more sense. I can understand hiding evidence from the public for a trial, but there should be a way for the public to see the evidence afterwards.

pixelkitteh

I'm not sure I fully understand but it looks like some kind of agreement between flynn and the court that in exchange for any information he gives he is given protection?

cyclops1771

No, protecting the evidence - making it confidential, and unable to be made public, even (especially) through an FOIA request.

BIGLY17

Shit should be illegal as clearly it’s unconstitutional to do so if you remain a sane individual.

pixelkitteh

Well that isn't great :(

chowmetal92

yes. at first I thought this was the Mueller request document for postponing the Flynn sentence, released a week or two ago. This is different? If I read this as far as I can understand, they want to bring in new evidence in the case? Explain your happening, OP.