u_spez_is_a_cuck

A reverse image search only brings up positive matches for the Newtown shooting. https://www.tineye.com/search/2ac97b8b12a889854b23694c55d03365271161a3/?page=1&sort=score&order=desc

rhy

I also hate when you die at Sandy Hook and then later are the lawyer for that kid who ostensibly shot up the movie theater in Aurora.

carlip

fake and gay. its the same pic.

Baconmon

No duh it is the same picture, that is why it is suspicious.. If you saw that picture on your TV during sandy hook, and then saw the same exact picture on your TV during the boston bombing, wouldn't you start to question things?..

carlip

No i would say some faggot, much like yourself, has clipped the scroll bar from one news station and placed it over the same image.

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

You're suggesting a group of people that are capable of faking deaths via some gigantic, sophisticated conspiracy involving hundreds of people to act as family, friends, coworkers, first responders, etc. Yet they are so lazy and incompetent as to use the same actor in multiple tragedies?

Are you seriously this fucking stupid? This image has no source and zero credibility. Why is this being voted up? This is controlled opposition. This is a distraction. Use your brains, retards.

oddjob

Not just the same actor, but the exact same family picture too. They couldn't afford multiple shots.

blackguard19

The image from Sandy Hook is of the principal, Dawn Hochsprung. I looked for "victims" of the Boston "bombing," and one of them is named Donna. However she does not look like Hochsprung.

So it is probably a bullshit picture.

But, both events are hoaxes and laughably stupid and obvious ones at that.

And anyone even suggesting otherwise is controlled opposition.

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

How are they hoaxes? To what extent?

blackguard19

That no one died with the possible exception of Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

Sorry, I find that ridiculous. Do you believe any bombs went off at all?

blackguard19

Sure, there was some kind of explosion, right there on 666 Boylston Ave.

It was announced beforehand when the Boston Globe tweeted that a demonstration bomb would go off as part of bomb squad activities, right there, across from the library.

Upon further examination it doesn't seem to have even blown up the windows behind it.

There are also no photos of damage from the blast or of the shrapnel we were told the pressure cooker bombs were filled with.

This is why I refer to this event as the "Boston Hoxathon Smoke Bombing."

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

The dead people aren't enough evidence? The images of injured people don't dissuade you? The hundreds of witness testimony? There are lots of videos online too.

In less than a few minutes I found the tweet you referred to. This was a controlled explosion done by the bomb squad tweeted about after the bombing. The bomb squad found a suspicious package and detonated it to be safe.

Read here https://storify.com/dkiesow/the-controlled-explosion-farce

blackguard19

What dead people? The images of injured people are physiologically impossible and fake-looking. Show your favorite one if you disagree.

You mean to tell me you think the Tsarnaev brothers actually detonated deadly bombs? And you're on a conspiracy forum, why?

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

3 people died that day. 17 people are now missing limbs. Blood was everywhere. "Fake-looking" isn't a great counter argument. Do you still believe your claim about that tweet and that being the only explosion?

Sorry I don't subscribe to the groupthink you're claiming. I'm on the conspiracy theory forum because I hate seeing bullshit peddled as fact.

blackguard19

Fake, bright red-orange blood was everywhere, yes. You can even see the moulage kits lying around, it was so amateurishly staged.

A former orthopedic trauma surgeon disagrees that anyone died. She says no one was even hurt that day.

Or anyone can go through the extensive photographic analysis that shows how the scene was staged step by step, frame by frame, at the website of the late great David McGowan.

http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/bostonmarathon/

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

Thanks for providing some info to back your claims.

blackguard19

At the time, I thought it was real and was following along with all the ensuing police pursuit and shootout action. I never believed that there would be a "fake" Muslim terror attack.

Oh_Well_ian

Unless, the psyop is purposefully riddled with contradictions, loose ends and obvious mistakes to create confusion and distraction, and prevent consensus from forming around the fundamental truth:

Our government is running psyops and false flags to fracture unity and sow mistrust.

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

That's moving the goal post to fit your theory. By that logic no evidence could ever convince you otherwise that these events weren't conspiracies. Circumstantial evidence is enough for a grand conspiracy but any contradiction can be ignored as a part of the same conspiracy?

Oh_Well_ian

I have zero opinion on this piece of circumstantial evidence and it's existence proves nothing, and disproves nothing. But I saw it when it first appeared and it's still being used the same way >> creating discord and fracturing consent.

9/11 is a perfect example of mass confusion created by colliding theories 'how it happened' while ignoring 'who did it'.

This is SOP in psyops against large populations.

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

Ok well crap like this floating around certainly doesn't help. Talk about creating discord. No cohesive theory really emerges so all we get is fractured pokes and prods into the accepted narrative. Something is fishy here or weird there, but it just leads people down endless rabbit holes.

So you say this is evidence of the sophistication of the conspirators? Isn't it more likely that evil exists and our government is actually so incompetent as to always protect us?

Oh_Well_ian

Yes.. you get my point in your first paragraph here.

'Evidence' comes from all angles. The incompetence you speak of is anything that is not perfect in the plan that is exposed in any number of ways. It really doesn't matter because these gaps in the official story are anticipated. Sandy Hook was the first major false flag in the Facebook era. The conspirators were likely more interested in studying the algorithms than they were in taking away guns. Like 9/11, it included massive government deception on all levels, including the President.

The recent massive attacks on the 1st Amendment across social media platforms and the rapid disintegration of the Parkland and Las Vegas shootings demonstrate that without Executive Branch involvement, these psyops are losing their effect at fracturing consent.

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

How was Sandy Hook a false flag? To what extent? Same question for 9/11

I don't really know what you mean because there is no cohesive, widely-accepted conspiracy theory on either.

Oh_Well_ian

How were SH and 9/11 FFlags? You cannot be serious.

Do you really think 4 planes get overtaken and piloted by faggots who never flew planes before without intercept by NORAD and the Air Force?

Do you really think Connecticut passed a bill 6 months before SH that sealed the autopsy records of minors for no particular reason?

Government isn't incompetent, it's almost universally corrupt.

I think I'm done here. I'm not into blue pilling morons nor am I into wasting time with shill accounts acting coyly.

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

I'm the shill account while you spread disinformation which distracts good people and discredits their movements.

I just don't know what you're talking about. To what extent were these false flags?

Was nobody really killed at SH? Or were they killed by someone other than Adam Lanza?

Who flew the planes into the towers? Or were they not all really planes?

Why is Trump still president if these grand conspirators are so capable of getting away with whatever they want?

Oh_Well_ian

yes.. you're a shill

buh bye

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT

You're a shill faggot you won't even say what it is you're suggesting. Talking with you is like trying to nail jello to the wall

Mr_Wolf

so my mother just glanced on this womans picture and said that she saw her on a 9/11 documentary.

CognitiveDissident5

They need more crisis act-whores

Whizwit21

Source on this? It's the same picture zoomed in this could be easily shopped

Baconmon

The fact that both are the same picture being shown on the 2 television shows is the exact reason it is suspicious.. I don't know why people in this thread think it is fake just because the MSM is using the same picture in both places..

ibepokey

pretty much what i thought when it was first posted. now, 4 hours later, still no sauce from OP

i vote niggerfaggotry

unclassified

That's what I was gonna say. This is the same pic. Not cool man.

Baconmon

Why does it have to be a different picture of the same person?.. Do you not think the MSM showing that same picture again in 2 different events isn't suspicious at all?..

FuckUredditFuckuSpez

Hey Retard, Source.

It doesn't matter if it's the same or different pic, what matters Is the source. Provide a fucking Link to each News Segment....

Whizwit21

I think it's suspicious they would even use the same person let alone not try to hide it better