The CDA 230 acts as a backdoor for the NWO agents and excuse for useful idiots like Twitter's CEO to censor what they deem "hate speech" (even though it deals with actual facts with statistics behind them and isn't based on hatred of any kind).

We all know that Twitter so far deplatformed Milo Yiannopolis (sorry if I've spelled it wrong), Sargon of Akkad and other voices of reason against all the liberal bullshit that goes on on the web. Google (mostly via YouTube) is doing the same thing, the only reason it isn't as widespread as in the case of Twitter is because Google is really inept at banning people.

They try to, they've demonetized a lot of conservative and alternative media, don't get me wrong, but they're inept at it.

That takes us back to the issue of CDA 230 which explicitly permits to remove some speech, without touching any speech that is just as offensive (if not more) but is spoken by someone who's political views (big surprise!) aligns with that of the administration. One of the biggest examples is the case of Leslie Jones who tweeted such lovely things as "Lord have mercy... white people shit" (more here ), where as Milo Yiannopolis (again, sorry if I spelled it wrong) gets banned for just retweeting the bigoted stuff she said.

Unfortunately, the CDA 230 is what enables such things to happen and we need to get it repelled. Call your congressman (especially if he's Republican) and tell them about the first amendment issues related to the CDA 230. There's a high chance he's an NWO agent and won't listen to your concerns, but you need to try anyway.

Anyone should be able to speak freely no matter where he or she is doing the speaking and it's high time to end the double standard CDA 230 allows for.