I can't deny the obvious redirection of public angst away from most pressing matters and towards the general faction known as Islam. Consider for a moment that the strict rules imposed within the religion are nothing more than age old solutions to many of the same problems which currently plague the modern western/european societies of today.

Nowhere is it more apparent than in the western world that crazy witch like women who have turned away from the clans their ancestor's built are an issue, picture that image of a crazy person dressed in drag demon clothing reading to children (clearly with the intent to traumatize them in some way, likely to induce some kind of dysmorphia that would loosen them up to future progressive conditioning) as an example of the actions of a single actor who has either consciously or unconsciously turned against their own people. This is only a drop of water in the ocean however when you consider the wave of extremely damaging principles embodied by certain organizations or political factions.

To tie this back to my initial observation about Islam, many of the principles with regard to women are simply a result of some wise men in leadership positions noticing : hey the women will do some crazy shit when they start scheming and deluding themselves with poisonous rhetoric. So in that regard, hats off to Islam for at least having a solution. Not my go to, as I would look instead to Nature itself for examples of more reasonable solutions, however the idea still stands.

Why does this entail a consipracy ? The reasoning is best examined from a fact/faction basis : In short we all know that there is a multi billion dollar online advocacy industry where (mostly liberal) investors pay for shilling and grassrooting and all that annoying stuff that we see on the net. What also no doubt exists is the think tanks that decide what to shill for and which (dare I say) "narratives" to go with. These are the conspirators that want certain factions to oppose each other even though their principles and goals allign in many ways. This is of course so that the real bad guys can slip through the cracks. I'm not really one to name the Jew because I have also studied russian history to some extent and for that reason I can look to the writings of revolutionary authors from that pre 1900 time period for a more literal explanation of why this "conspiracy" is occuring. Emmanuel Malynski said it best when he identified the nature of the trick : Which is and was a unification of certain key factions (communism, feminism, and judeocaptalbankernepointernationalism - sensational but a good summary of a long book) This unification would result in world wide revolution and the implementation of a deathstate or global state of decay with the intention of one ruling class above the ashes etc...) To relate back to the initial claim of consipracy ie playing certain factions against each other, it is quite simple : while the deathforces listed above ally into one large faction they clearly want to impede their opposites from doing the same. In short drive a wedge and distract from the proper focus.