( conspiracy )

submitted by [deleted]

AnarchicAlpaca

Angry iranian woman with a scarf! Lol.

ArousedYeti

Alright I give up.. what is a green shooting mask??

ArousedYeti

If I shoot a home intruder with that mask on, do I get to blame it on some random 15 year old male on SSRIs?

ArousedYeti

What purpose does that serve? Other than turning the shooter into a ghost. Oh! So that's a government spook!

unclassified

Woa, Hannible Lector

Oh_Well_ian

buddy.. and they need to do is put a face to a narrative.

there is absolutely no way to prove if anybody died if bodies are not presented.

Sandy Hook.. Pulse... Parkland... no bodies. only stories of bodies.

monkeytoe101

And lemme guess, any video cameras that could have caught him were off that day or the data file containing that time stamp was "accidentally" deleted.

Oh_Well_ian

Got have the second shooter to confirm there ever was a FIRST SHOOTER without an investigation.

This 'witness' is a YouTube employee, which makes his account dubious.

Just who is the 'we' he is referring to?

Whizwit21

Both quotes are from the same person. Why in each instance have we only had 1 person mention the body armor? If he said "we all ran" I would really like to hear someone else that was there confirm it.

oddjob

This guy was probably lying to get attention

River_Otter

I am beginning to think these known crazies (this one's father called cops before she started firing) have handlers. Lanza was on the FBI radar. Cruz was definitely on it. Use the crazies to do maximum damage in order to push the gun ban agenda? Even the drugged Arora shooter kept asking cops "where the other guy went?".

I keep thinking about O'Keefe's vids, where Clinton camp admits it is easy to push crazies into acting on their behalf.

mrnobu

Yes - all it takes is targeted EEG Heterodyning

Nana66

My theory is a little different....I think the patsy's were not actually involved. I think they groom the patsy and set them up as the shooter with things like a YT comment saying they are going to be a school shooter. The actual shooters are wearing body armor so my theory is that Hogg and second shooter Emma did their deed and left the gear for the Sherriffs to put in the van and the video of Hogg was pre-recorderded during the drill with fake bullets that SOUND REAL for some odd reason.

RampancyLambentRaven

Yes now to prove the corrupt FBI and corrupt cops take advantage of the mentally retarded vulnerable adults in society and push them over the edge and brainwash them into saying and acting how the FBI wants and proving the patsies are innocent.

Oh_Well_ian

I believe you're right about the patsy's.

But I say NONE of these incidents are anything but a staged productions with scripts and actors. The local police are in on it and so are corrupt FBI.

Nana66

I agree that it's probable that no one gets shot but I don't believe they wouldn't kill real people if they need to.

Oh_Well_ian

The people who are whacked are the ones who talk, after the false flags. So yes, they kill people. The 'drills' provide the video, the narrative is already written, the actors have rehearsed their lines, the media has the copy.

The primary focus of all these hoaxes it to stir up confusion and prevent consent from forming. They spin off multiple false narratives, designed for endless bickering between citizens. The 2nd Amendment narratives are seen as the most effective because of the 50/50 nature of the debate.

Notice how the first witness 'testimony' is always the 'second shooter'. It does not come out in the MSM, though. Only on the so-called 'fringe'. The Second Shooter narrative establishes the First Shooter without even asking the question: 'is this real?'. It also neatly divides up the normies who watch the MSM and internet community.