Who do you report people to? God damn you're fucking annoying faggot sometimes.

Come to that, was Eratostenes part of the "round Earth" conspiracy?

You really only have to tell a few people the theory of space and flash some authority and have no competing popular authorities disagree with you and you can pretty much raise an army to promote the idea that actually believe it. I mean look at communism as an example. Horrible for people, but they will fight and die for it in huge numbers against their best interest becauses of a well presented theoretical sales pitch.

Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?

Nope finished my test in 5 minutes because I programed everything into my graphic calculator and then proceeded to program and play games on it or work up the next section for the next test and set of assignments into it. My natural strength is spatial reasoning.

Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?

an arbitrary location where you give up and turn around. A parlor trick can make a compass spin if someone wants to really be convincing but you don't even get a steady flood of people making compases spin in antartica so it's not really even dealt with I don't think.

If photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?

Incorrect. Photos of a round earth do not exist. Images of a round earth are fraudulent and misleading. People create images of a flat earth all the same, but we don't have the high tech software and data NGIS and NASA does.

The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What possible financial motive did they have?

So you see the significance of what difference it makes one way or the other. These kinds of questions which seek to deter research because one might not like the unsettling implications. When you come to realize it's flat your research has just begun.

What financial motives could NASA have?

The nature of the earth does not depend on NASA's motives. But it would be revealing and cause for investigation if they purport a ball but in fact it is flat.

How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth the light projection would have to be a semi circle.

Never said the sun was a spot light. I said the earth was flat. The sun is exactly what we observe it to be.

Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?

all things smash up into the vanishing point as they go off into the distance. Video games don't account for the curvature of the earth but their vanishing point perfectly replicates a real world vanishing point. Some games fog everything off into the distance, but there are those that can be made not to.

Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?

Same reason as the sun and moon are not seen constantly. They disappear into obscurity through the vanishing point.

Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?

Coriolis is related to magnetism. There is a ring magnet field that is connected to the firmament somehow. Electromagnetism is in play here hence the aurora borealis etc..

If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn't the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?

We have not seen the edge. We observe Ice, but we also have record of maps that show inhabited land where the Ice now is. You don't hear about this because the powers that be just say it was all fantasy and error and the got everything mixed up all the time.

If the oceans would pour off the edge of the flat Earth if they could, where would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?

We have not seen the ends of the earth. We are confined by an ice wall (Antarctica) and the Firmament (dome)

Just because those who promote a globe claim to know it all doesn't mean any refuting arguments of their fraud must also purport to know it all.

Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?

Proof?

Your slandered me LOL. Don't be an ass take it one thing at a time this is the interwebs and that is far to much shit all at once. I will respond to the first one I read.

Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?

There is no proof of celestial bodies. What is observed are little lights in the sky. Some wandering lights aka planets and some fixed in the firmament which spins overhead.

Nobody is around. I talk to people personally about it all the time. I even tell them what I know from being a former NASA contractor without any fear. Playing a video to an empty room is bull shit. I got alot going on and thats all the time I got for you I can only argue with one idiot at a time and right now that's "tallest shill" or some shit

Watching the winter solstice and equinox part. I gave serious examination in spite of the presenter providing no sources for his information in the first part. However now they are clearly using math to create these animations and not actual data points. If they are willing to pass that on in the later half it starts to draw the first half even into greater doubt. Ultimately I have to utterly disregard this as they have supplied no evidence at all. This proof is the analogous adaptation of ESPN sports analysis to the flat-globe earth debate. This is not evidence. Please start by proving gravity. Gravity doesn't exist.

1:55 There is no midnight sun in Antarctica, it is notably much colder in Antarctica and intensely more ice. The intense cold would make sense if there was never midnight sun there at any time all year. Otherwise the intense cold and extreme quantity of ice compared to the Arctic circle would be an unexplained phenomenon. Given this the rational hypothesis is that without clear well vetted and repeatable testing proving a midnight sun in Antarctica the rational conclusion is there is non. The notable lack of evidence and inability for anyone to really travel and stay in Antarctica during that time of year without having an association with government backed scientific institutions and military keeps the choke hold on the information with them. Applying a scientific mind to it repeatedly government and military have proven they cannot be trusted when they have this kind of power over information.

Midnight sun is illogical, and only verified by an untrustworthy source.

again to elaborate on the other point I made in the other post and my general observations so far into the video it hangs upon the Gleason Map being accurate. Stating that the earth is not a globe and is flat doesn't mean the Gleason map is accurate automatically. Those who observe a flat earth and speak publicly about it do not also have the resources to preform geological surveys outside of trusting intel from government and military which I previously had demonstrated is untrustworthy.

That said the vectors on a more accurate map could perhaps converge perfectly well which also would guard against the potential refute you may find of coordinated efforts at measuring the suns angle at the exact time across the world.

at 1:06 an insufficiently substantiated argument is made and due to the sloppy evidence provided an incorrect conclusion is made.

The sun as it travels over the course of the year moves closer and closer to the north pole and then closer and closer the the magnetic south pole of the ring magnet field. It will be found at different points continually. The only way to accurately determine the convergence of the vectors or divergence is to actually take instrument readings from the different points at the exact same time. This would have to be an intentional measurement for the purpose of determining the distance of the sun from earth. However the loose correlation without such controls demonstrated to be in place gives me an even stronger hypothesis to test as more exact control will provide more exact results and given what we see is what we would expect if we tested with the inverse of control intentionally if the results were that the earth is flat and the sun is close upon intentional exact control.

Yes, they seriously believe this.

I vote we remove these people from the gene pool before their retardation breeds and they pass it on to the next generation.

Kinda... It moves overhead http://geoshifter.com/images/sun-hotspot-on-clouds.jpg