care to provide link instead?

The right has this shit planned. If you aren't aware of what old money is. It controls the world. Tens of trillions of dollars in assets. The part people miss is that they only see rich as meaning/coming from liquid money + stocks etc. The very apparent stuff. They miss the owned debts and well hidden assets. Apple is the wealthiest company, right? laff. I forget but I think it's JP Morgan chase has well over $2trillion owed to them - debt. That's wealth. It's also more powerful than $2 trillion liquid cash.

Noticed how TPP is going around with relatively little notice by the general population? Oh. But gays can get married /yawn whatever. Oh and Ellen Pao is being held down by the cruel man.

The right. Well. No. The right and the left are the same fucking thing. Different means, identical ends. The big difference is the left has new money, the right has old money. Gates is new money. He's not that rich. He's the wealthiest in obvious wealth yes. If you think people with tens of billions of dollars keep it in plain sight. I have news for you: they don't.

For the left ends = right ends but means are different thing. Has anyone else noticed how the right wants to break encryption for the whole NSA nonsense. The left wants to so anonymity is gone from the internet. Different means, same ends.

I said it once and I'll say it again I can't stand that they paint Ellen as a fighter of equality in silicon valley when all she is, is a money chasing opportunist.

Because the goal is not what you think it is. Feminism doesn't even factor.

The goal is to subjugate and insult your mind with nonsense until it doesn't work properly, until you begin to doubt reality itself. They'll throw insane stories at you, they'll make you stomp around with rage because the whole society has missed the whole point of the story. They'll make you paranoid and terrified that something you might do will cause this crazy cascade somehow, with you as the target. They'll get you wondering what the hell has happened to the human mind that this stuff can even happen. You'll say what happened to the world, why is everything so strange strange strange and insane!??!

And then they will rule you.

They would rather put forward the small gender inequality gap (that they are historically to blame for in the first place) than the massive class inequality gap. Smokes and mirrors by pyromaniac firefighters.

I think wired might have been somewhat satirical. Like "oh Ellen, you got yourself fired this time? Before the just denied you an undeserved raise"

The rest are just written by people who should have ended up in a Kleenex.

Narcissist are fast at showing to everyone around that THEY are the victim. Most of the time there arguments don't stand up at all, but it doesn't matter since they are expert in manipulation, so unsuspecting people buy it anyway. It's rule #1 : if you attack them, you will be seen as the aggressor. Rule# 2: don't try to use logic, you will fail!

I guess we're just using different dictionaries. I was applying the classical definition of "a situation where many people leave the same place at the same time," whereas you must have meant, "when I leave a place months ago. Yeah. That's when an exodus begins."

Please don't click on the links, don't give these cocksuckers the ad revenue.

I think it's their way of letting her save face a little for fracking up so badly. You can't blame them for circling the wagons around one of their own - marginalizing the legitimacy of someone's complaint by demogoguing them (read: censorship) is on page one of their playbook.

I'm well aware, but Victoria was the tip of the iceberg, the last drop before the cup run over. You know what I mean...

That's what started the unrest; not the exodus.

Click bait. You say it's something radical like misogyny so people who agree will share to celebrate and people who disagree will share to say it's bullshit.

You linked multiple articles about it. Congratulations, you contributed.

Because mainstream media is propaganda. The ruling elite control the media, and they're using it to sew division in between the lower classes. Man against woman. White against black. Muslim against Christian. The idea is to get people scared and feeling isolated. In this manner, a populace is easier to control.

A good portion of the modern media can be explained through the 1984 newspeak term: doublethink. I assume you already have an idea of what it is, so to answer your question most feminists are using doublethink to have contradicting ideas in their heads. As feminism has gotten older, more misinformation has been spread about the plight of oppressed women, and as a result Pao is just another oppressed minority attacked by the Patriarchy.

I don't personally believe these things, but the media uses these clickbait titles because marketing to SJWs is very profitable nowadays. A "social justice warrior" tends to be someone passionate enough to talk the talk, but never walk the walk, so they tend to be the main audience in these stories about "being oppressed". All that being said, I think the whole mess will die down soon since the media is just craving for a new scandal every day.