I think I'm a good patriot for not supporting the troops. Israel knew it was Americans without a doubt.

You only support the troops when you are active and among them...civilians have no duty to "support" shit...go fuck yourself with your reddit faggotry. Israel sucks shit without you trying to grief porn morons into jacking off idiots who failed into military service.

Well said, far too many people get caught up in the military worship. When our military does things like iraq, afghanistan, libya, viet nam ect ect it NEEDS to be condemned for what it is, war crimes. We shouldn't have to walk on eggshells and give passive consent because a family member served. Your uncle john didn't order the invasion but the invasion IS a crime against humanity.

hear, hear!

Palestine must be cleaned of the false jews, they should all be deported to Birodidzhan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Shit happens.

I dont support the troops, all they do is fight and die for Israel. Their number one reason for being in the middle east is as a presence for Israel, why would I support that?

What's even more disgusting, they had a plane flying to Egypt and ready to drop a nuke in Cairo. Think of the loss of lives and human history lost in a flash because Zionists wanted to expand anyway possible.

I've seen a few christ cucks actually support israel for some reason.

I don't "support the troops" at all. They, through their ignorance or greed, feed the government beast with their compliance.

The US military has not "fought for our freedom" since 1775. EACH and every war after we became a country was either started or instigated directly due to our own government.

War of 1812- At the outset of the 19th century, Great Britain was locked in a long and bitter conflict with Napoleon Bonaparte’s France. In an attempt to cut off supplies from reaching the enemy, both sides attempted to block the United States from trading with the other.

Mexican War- It pitted a politically divided and militarily unprepared Mexico against the expansionist-minded administration of U.S. President James K. Polk, who believed the United States had a “manifest destiny” to spread across the continent to the Pacific Ocean.

Civil War- arguments about how much power the states should have versus how much power the federal government should have. The southern states felt that the federal government was taking away their rights and powers.

As the United States continued to expand westward, each new state added to the country shifted the power between the North and the South. Southern states began to fear they would lose so much power that they would lose all their rights. Each new state became a battleground between the two sides for power.

Spanish American War- The Cuban conflict was injurious to U.S. investments in the island, which were estimated at $50 million, and almost ended U.S. trade with Cuban ports, normally valued at $100 million annually. On the insurgent side, the war was waged largely against property and led to the destruction of sugarcane and sugar mills.

WWI- The American businessmen were very interested in the Allied victory and many such as J.P. Morgan helped fund British and French war efforts with approximately $3 billion in loans and bond purchases. If the Allies would be defeated by the Central Powers, they probably wouldn’t be able to repay their debt to their US lenders. Many businessmen therefore supported the so-called ‘Preparedness Movement’ which campaigned for the US intervention in the war on the side of the Allied forces.

WWII- Due to the United States' relatively amicable relations with both the USSR and China, it too began to publicly criticize the Japanese for their increasing aggression.

The United States cautioned Japan against further aggressive actions by threatening to cut off shipments of raw materials to the nation. This was an especially risky situation for Japan, its only source of oil and metal came from the United States, while their primary source of rubber came from the British territories in Malaya. Therefore, it would seem that the nation would have to tread lightly to avoid angering the West. Or would it?

• I'm spending way too much time on this one post, I'm not your fucking REAL History teacher . You can read about the REAL causes of US involvement all on your own unless you're too fucking stupid to be deprogrammed. You get the idea.

American should have and should mind it's own fucking business and not dick around as if it's The World Police .

Post links to facts

"Supporting the troops" is a divide and conquer brainwashing tool.

Troops get free health care, free room and board, free food AND they get paid, plus they're volunteers. Fuck off with support the troops. Easiest pysop to spot in the wild for anyone with a brain.

Part of the underlying problem is that probably over 2 out of 3 people could not tell you what happened to the U.S.S. Liberty. It is hard to get people to understand important points about this attack if you have to start from scratch with everyone. Coupled with it happening 50 years ago, seems like a non starter for action against Israel. Maybe a nice red pill eye opener.

I support the troops by rallying for candidates who are least likely to get them killed in some kike war for Muh Greatest Ally™.

It might not be popular, but you’ve got to ask the hard questions.

Why would Israe bomb the ship? Either you believe the US is there Ally, or their pawn. Both wouldn’t make sense to blow up.

Why would you blow up the ship, and then immediately admit that you did it by accident, and apologetically pay several million dollars in reparations for the families .

By blowing up the ship, you would barely weaken the U.S. Navy, While risking exposing Isreal’s alrerior motives

That just doesn’t make sense to me, but maybe y’all have some answers.

Patioticuck is the one that supports the troops and supports isntreal.

Thank you for posting these facts.

Israel must be nuked.