yewotm8

Lol at anybody eating breakfast cereal

CarbuncleRoy

I've sprayed glyphosate since the early 80's.

Ate Quaker Oatmeal for about 45 years or so, too.

Neither me nor any of my long-term employees have cancer.

Use your PPE. Follow label instructions.

aileron_ron

I once saw a documentary about nuclear bomb testing back in the 40's and how they infected millions with radioactive cereal in an experiment to see the results, I know some think BS but here you go .

OtisT

Once they start looking they will find that shit in lots of things.

Gorillion

medievelwoodblockprintofjewspoisoningtownwell.jpg

KosherHiveKicker

The U.S. industry bathes their seeds, and the crops those seeds grow in Roundup.

It is literally in anything produced with corn, wheat, sorghum, and soy beans.

TurdLord5000

I'm less and less concerned every time someone tells me my all-meat diet is a bad thing.

morose

It's in the animal's food.

TurdLord5000

True. But: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/28727079/ "Similarly, because mammals do not bioaccumulate glyphosate and it is rapidly excreted, negligible levels of glyphosate in cattle, pig and poultry meat, milk, and eggs have been reported."

Testicular

Those animals are fed glyphosate too.

mynewaccountagain

Gylosphosate is in a lot more than Roundup.

NakedWarrior

About five years ago, I read a report that stated it is present in over 85% of all food consumed by Americans, so even if you wanted to, there's no way to get it out of your diet. This report also linked it to the ever-growing numbers of children with allergies, asthma, skin diseases, and Autism. I would bet it is also responsible for the increase of intestinal, stomach, and colon cancers which were almost unheard of pre-1970s. (Not to mention our propensity for processed foods). Even if they stopped all production and banned it, it would likely take decades for our water and soil to heal.

totes_magotes

Of all the stupid things, jesus fuck. This is going to get thrown out almost immediately. The lab is anti-GMO/pesticide, the study was funded by an anti-GMO/pesticide group, the study had no controls and was not peer reviewed or replicated.

That means that until there's a second study and it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there was no issues with the "experiment" and so on that no one can sue again. Note that it's not whether or not there's a second study. It's when the data is exhaustively studied. That can take years . Instead of waiting for a second study to confirm the results, some moronic retard just went ahead and ruined it for everyone.

KosherHiveKicker

All that man's attorney needs to prove is Roundup's presence in that product.

Game Over.

totes_magotes

How's he gonna do that? He's a lawyer, not a science lab. There needs to be a second set of findings that confirms the first. Any competent judge is going to dismiss this without a confirmation study.

KosherHiveKicker

So you are saying an attorney can't hire/contract an independent lab(s) to simply test for the presence of Roundup in random samples of a product?

totes_magotes

  1. The lawyer is not going to hire them. They lawyer is not going to pay for it. That's all on the client.

  2. Once the suit has been filed, there's a limited amount of time to get everything together. Science doesn't just happen. It takes time.

This is something that should have been done before the lawsuit, hence my original comment. But to hear everyone scream about what I said, you'd think that I'm saying that it's not in the food. I'm saying that a second study needed to have been done before the lawsuit. And since it's highly unlikely that a second study will be completed before the court date, the judge is very likely to dismiss it, possibly with prejudice. That means that anyone else wanting to sue now not only has to wait until a second study is done, they have to wait until the data is analyzed to make sure that it is air tight.

If the dude had waited until a second study, he might have squeaked by with just having a second study. But now it has to be studied again and then analyzed to within an inch of the data's life. That can take quite a while.

SurfinMindWaves

It pisses me off that you are getting downvoted for having a different and reasonable opinion on the science. Upvote from me!

totes_magotes

Thanks. Don't get pissed off though. Everyone loves to hate on something. Be patient, keep repeating it. Sooner or later, someone will see what's going on.

KosherHiveKicker

The lawyer is not going to hire them. They lawyer is not going to pay for it. That's all on the client.

An Attorney-Law Firm who is looking at the big picture, and deep pockets of the defendant will gladly foot the bill if they see a viable case.

totes_magotes

I know what pro bono is and it doesn't always cover additional expenditures such as hiring other professionals to generate evidence.

Got a source one what law firm is representing Mounira Doss and whether or not it is pro bono?

The short answer is "No" because it's behind a pay wall.

OP article links to : https://www.reuters.com/article/products-general-mills-glyphosate/general-mills-hit-with-lawsuit-over-glyphosate-containing-cheerios-idUSL2N1VB1MY

Which in turn links to : https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/v2?culture=en-US&productid=CBT&returnto=https%3A%2F%2F1.next.westlaw.com%2FCosi%2FSignOn%3FredirectTo%3D%252fDocument%252fI8a976b31a4c211e8ae4cc0fd228067bd%252fView%252fFullText.html%253fnavigationPath%253dSearch%25252fv1%25252fresults%25252fnavigation%25252fi0ad604ab0000016559b7194a91531cdf%25253fNav%25253dNEWS%252526fragmentIdentifier%25253dI8a976b31a4c211e8ae4cc0fd228067bd%252526startIndex%25253d1%252526contextData%25253d%25252528sc.Category%25252529%252526transitionType%25253dSearchItem%2526listSource%253dSearch%2526listPageSource%253d34c6c936cd470631fd99c7c8a8f7fc21%2526list%253dNEWS%2526rank%253d7%2526sessionScopeId%253def032cac0f27a0a4fa36a530baef9c60025924d708bda256911507c4a1c056cc%2526originationContext%253dcategorypagelisting%2526transitionType%253dSearchItem%2526contextData%253d%28sc.Category%29%2526firstPage%253dtrue&tracetoken=0824181042300qAzk3Ymo1YLlVBV0SDQTeJ5Jdq546NtBTTvQ82fg_LJ-O_HjUESA8pfRaW9SGMH6cP-KGQH0NqlvP4LCOVUebMPmx_t7JE42l-PNm24-7qcPcuzJEDsyQRCQUJc3aCnR5oNmdS7cnyQ38UoiRyQcbGoD1Weujx9mF3pfA9RnujmH0VT3rWuxiK1oDPZUJtCZwzGz63xRdF25b9xlBPyXtRY_9gcp--Cru08mGNMs0m1l3p-VSATqdcPGjRNBKzmETvQHtpaPtVwBnyFwefHdc-szehwb2FiINStTUlbLdqUmzaGQwLzcPQXqTNKu4-luwsLTQxAf6o4d70Cyq-_HMA&lr=0&bhcp=1

KosherHiveKicker

Attorney Edward L. Masry took on all costs to prove the case against PG&E. His firm took ~50% of the $295 (in 1993 Dollars) Million Settlement.

There is no reason Mounira Doss couldn't follow the same model, and partner with another Law Firm once the case proceeds to the point that more help/money is needed.

Fuck you @TotesMcDouchebag

totes_magotes

Oh, wait, you're doing Rule by Exception fallacy. You can name one exception so of course you're 100% right. You were doing sooo well for a minute there. (hint: your inner (((jew))) is showing)

KosherHiveKicker

No. No I don't.

It is common practice for Attorney's to collaborate, and take on additional co-counsel as cases proceed through the legal system.

Legal Definition of co-counsel

an attorney who assists in or shares the responsibility of representing a client

totes_magotes

Please go back and reread what I wrote right before you sperged out.

it doesn't always cover additional expenditures such as hiring other professionals to generate evidence

Counsel hiring does not generate evidence but hiring a lab does. That’s an important distinction.

KosherHiveKicker

It is common practice for another Attorney-Law Firm to be brought on for cost-sharing / funding the efforts to generate evidence

I can link hundreds of cases that have done exactly that.

totes_magotes

It's been, shit, let's call it a full day. I asked you for evidence, you provided none. You're either a liar or you wanted to believe in what you were saying without thinking or knowing.

So, without evidence, you you don't have a point.

KosherHiveKicker

Right... Right... "No Evidence"

There are all ready studies used to win cases, and they specifically name Cheerios. It would be a so easy to find and fund another study to explore the claims in existing work(s).

totes_magotes

I'm still waiting for you to provide me evidence that pro bono lawyers will hire scientific labs to generate evidence for a trial on a regular basis. You've had 24 hours and 2, no, 3 requests now.

You refuse to provide proof so that makes you a liar.

KosherHiveKicker

Pro-Bono Firm White & Case - Started the lead poisoning litigation case on behalf of the children of Flint. The firm fronted all costs to produce evidence which forced the creation of a two-tier screening process of all Flint residents, and the funding their follow up care.

@totes_ass_chapped

totes_magotes

That's one. You need to prove more than one in order to not be guilty of "rule by exception." Give me at least two more.

KosherHiveKicker

I didn't lie. I produced the proof.

Go Fuck Yourself.

totes_magotes

Rule by exception . Fucking learn it, retard.

KosherHiveKicker

  • Goal Post #1: "Prove Me Wrong"
  • Goal Post #2 "Prove Me Wrong Within 24 Hours"

Gets Proven Wrong

  • Goal Post #3 "Prove Me Wrong At Least Three Times"

How many times are you going to move the goal posts?

@totesmasaltminer

totes_magotes

I told you from the start that you needed to prove that a majority of times (very specifically to rule out rule by exception), pro bono lawyers will hire outside firms to generate evidence. You came back with some nonsense about lawyers hiring other lawyers (to do work) and some place in there you keep throwing up the same single incident.

You said pro bono lawyers, as a matter of course, hire outside firms (aside from lawyers) to generate evidence.

You have yet to prove it. You can't. Because you're a fucking kiar. All you can spit out is "rule by exception", ad hominems, and cry like a little faggot baby.

Oh, speaking of which, I got a great recording of you this morning. {Wanna see it?]( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjkNNDuAb9A) )

Dumb cocksucker.

totes_magotes

If you have something that shows that lawyers will hire scientific labs to verify the results of one based in a lawsuit (where there's only the one result) and do it on a regular basis (to rule out "rule by exception"), please show me.

totes_magotes

Why don’t you show me how?

Oh_Well_ian

You're a faggot. Go drink a gallon of Roundup, shitbag.

The FDA is OWNED by corporations like Bayer and Monsanto, and had cunt Hillary Clinton helping write laws and push low standards.

They were not even using Roundup for it's intended use, but were spraying it on crops to speed up the natural drying process.

We need fewer sycophantic cunts like you on this planet.

Mylon

He's a shill through and through. He shitposts just enough on Soapdox to pretend to be a legitimate user, and then goes full on Bayer apologist when necessary.

My_Name_is_Not_Sure

Roundup is tasty and it keeps my insides weed free all season long.

totes_magotes

No wacky-baccy for you!

totes_magotes

You hate science, how cute.

Oh_Well_ian

Yeah.. I'm sure chemical companies have nothing to do with the explosion of cancers over the last 30 years.

Eat that factory food up, you stupid cunt. Eat it.

totes_magotes

You sound like one of those libtard jew fucks that want to whine and cry when someone says to whine and cry without any real proof.

Real science attempts to replicate the results before drawing a conclusion.

Thus, you hate science. You have no place in modern western culture. Go back to the middle east, you cretin.

Oh_Well_ian

Except JEWS run Monsanto, Bayer and the FDA, you stupid cunt.

hahahaha what a fucking dipshit!!

totes_magotes

You are literally saying that you will accept ANY "study" the second it is released without verifying shit.

There is nothing more brainwashed and stupid than that.

Except the fact that you're arguing for this retarded insanity.

Oh_Well_ian

go suck JEW cock...

oh shit.. you already are!!!

totes_magotes

Looks like I hit the nail on the head. You can't understand the important of science. Tell me, if they had said that Kryptonite was in there, you'd be just as happy? No need to answer, I know you would.

Oh_Well_ian

I'm kicking the shit out of you, shilly Jew faggot, of course I will get the last word.

You're a masochistic pile of garbage and a cunt.

totes_magotes

You need to kick harder. All I see is a moron masturbating in front of a keyboard.

SquarebobSpongebutt

If the levels are within FDA guidelines there is little chance for a suit to be won anyway. At least outside of a California labeling violation which doesn't apply in Florida.

VaccinesArePoison

Muh FDA knows best!