You don't need to kill to do so, but yeah, it's a real effect in lab rats, so why wouldn't the world's richest do it too?

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/05/science/young-blood-may-hold-key-to-reversing-aging.html
etc.

Simpsons did it. I swear, that show knows too much . . .

The moral dilemma becomes where do you draw the line?

And if this practice is already happening behind closed doors (it is) then wouldn't it be better to have an observably regulated practice that ensures the consent of the blood donators?

I personally think it is a slippery slope that will prey on the poor and the helpless. And considering the ailments which may be cured by mushrooms (research has been validated for a number of cures by mushrooms) this blood crap seems overly invasive and frankly, fucking retarded.

It's more sustainable to harvest young blood locally than fly to the bay area once a quarter.

And if you do research and find out where they actually get all this blood from its actually horrific. It does not all come from "legitimate" sources.

Where do they get the children's blood? Who are the children? Where are the parents?

All great questions to ask.

And yet they are frail as fuck and die anyway. gg.

No wonder they’re so worried about immigrant children

"You show me a capitalist, and I'll show you a bloodsucker."-Malcolm X