Pollycracker

Welcome to the NWO because these wireless companies are the tip of the spear.

fuckmyreddit

Kill 5G. I can hardly live in an area with the current G. Just kill it.

I dont want to move to Africa, but I cant live with this toxic buzz. I am sure there must be another frequency that doesn't destroy people. I've never read about an alternate frequency, but I'm sure there's something... We could go back to wired internet and outlaw wifi within 20 ft of another home. In the meantime just kill smart meters, smart anything, smart cars, smart means stupid to these people. I would give up my smartphone if we could get rid of 5G and killer wifi. I'm sure there's a less toxic way to kill off white people. Got any suggestions my dear Qanon?

qwop

Do you live in the US? There's a town in the US where all wireless is forbidden. You could try and move there:

"The Town Where Wireless Signals Are Illegal":
http://mentalfloss.com/article/52137/west-virginia-town-where-wireless-signals-are-illegal

There's also ways to shield your room, bed, or even the whole house, although it can get pretty expensive. In Germany they are already building some homes that are shielded from the ground up.

senpaithatignoresyou

To be fair, there is an economic incentive to replace wired utilities: wires suck.

You have to watch out where you dig, if a cable gets damaged it has to be replaced. If the peasants rebel, they can disable communications by cutting cables. you have to keep the cables in stock. If you are in an urban area, then the cable lines and infrastructure under ground are a nightmare. The old system is a logistical nightmare. So it makes sense that they would want to replace it.

fuckmyreddit

So you'd rather fry and fry your children than deal with logistics? Wait. I may have misread your comment. We dont hide our thoughts and feelings on Voat.

senpaithatignoresyou

Let me ask you a simple question: do you turn your cell phone off when you pump gas? The sign says to, yet i never see anyone do that. Now, if the 5g transmissions cause RF indignation of gasoline, or ammunition to be set off, then i will be concerned. If i start seeing cops with brand new cellphones having weapons discharges, i will become concerned.

I was a FFG-7 nav aids tech in the navy. i worked on radar. Ship board air search radar had a lot of wattage behind it, and could cook popcorn in a bag on some of the bigger platforms. So yes, RF can be dangerous regardless of frequency, but only if there is a lot of power behind it. IF 5G is as dangerous as some people suspect, then we will see it interfere with other forms of electronics, as per government regulation. It says so on the devices you buy " must not interfere with electrical communication, must accept harmful interference ". That is an indicator if there is something dangerous going on.

The problem with the "it cooks our kids" mentality is that if it is not transmitting at a high enough range to set off flammable items, then it is far from the most toxic electrical emission. Smoke detectors emit more toxic radiation than current cell phones.

No, my biggest concern is that they are centralizing communications networks because they have become aware that too many people in the public know how to disable communications. The last thing they want to see is a yellow vest protest in america. We are not stupid like the french cucks, we would bring (((global trade))) to a stand still. You never see terrorists blow up power stations, sabotage those green phone boxes, or even mess with train tracks.

qwop

Unfortunately the latest science indicates thermal effects are not needed to cause biological harm. That's the problem. Microwaves seem to cause biological effects even way below current safety limits.

Here's an example of some effects and studies, ranked by transmission power:
https://i.imgur.com/14uxRru.png

Here's a fun one. Microwaves altering brain glucose metabolism:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892/

senpaithatignoresyou

Here's a fun one. Microwaves altering brain glucose metabolism:

Now that is very interesting, as brain glucose issues are what cause alzheimer's.

I would like to see what you have archived. On one hand i am skeptical that they would release a dangerous product on the public, but on the other hand i do not underestimate the stupidity of the human race.

The worst thing that will happen is i will read scientific studies and have better knowledge on the subject.

qwop

but on the other hand i do not underestimate the stupidity of the human race.

I think you found the real culprit :)

Remember, we used to X-ray people's feet, just to fit shoes:
https://daily.jstor.org/when-shoes-were-fit-with-x-rays/

Also do not forget greed. The only reason they pulled those off the market, was because customers got wind of the danger, and stopped going into shoe stores. It took 20 years for this process to happen.

For more studies I suggest to follow the blog of Joel M. Moskowitz, he scans all the latest publications, and produces summaries on his website. Like this one (500 papers):

https://www.saferemr.com/2018/04/recent-research.html

Then we have the BioInitiative report, which in 2012 did a meta-study on 1800 scientific papers on electromagnetic fields and their effects, and published their conclusions here:

http://www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions/

Here's another pretty serious single study. Brain proteins were found to be modified by wireless phone radiation:

Summary:
https://ehtrust.org/mobile-and-cordless-phone-radiation-alters-brain-proteins-may-be-key-to-cancer-and-dementia/

Direct link to the study:
"Brain proteome response following whole body exposure of mice to mobile phone or wireless DECT base radiation":

And if you really want to dig in. Here's a list of list of 1670 peer-reviewed papers on EM fields and their effects:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CbWmdGTnnW1iZ9pxlxq1ssAdYl3Eur3/view

And here is the page from the World Health Organization (WHO), recommending the German searchable database of over 27,000 publications on EM field research:

https://www.who.int/peh-emf/research/database/en/

If you prefer video presentations, search for Olle Johansson on Youtube, he is a professor of neurology at the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, and his presentations on this subject are both entertaining (although the subject is dire) and informative:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=olle+johansson

Dortex

Wires suffer from little, if any, interference. They can also carry several dozen terabytes of data apiece, theoretically speaking. If you want to.uograde your fiber network, the wires don't ever have to be touched since the bottleneck lies with the rest of your equipment.

downton-stabby

Wires also work great in emergencies and disasters.

ItsBad

Mmmm. An excuse to replace wired connections. 5G makes a little more sense to me now. I thought they couldn't pull it off because 5G requires ridiculous amounts of communications towers. So they would flounder the rollout like they always do. But if they do it over years and years and refuse to invest or even sabotage wired connections...

HenryCabotLodge

Sounds about right. Octopus AT&T eats everything.

Pollycracker

CIA

HenryCabotLodge

Yea. Ok. Make sense.