johnnyblastoff

If they cared at all about the truth, they'd be investigating Sir Andrew Wood and the UK's Royal Institute of International Affairs think tank. Wood was the quiet player behind distribution of the dossier and he laughs during think tank discussions about how he likes to break up countries.

allonthesameteam

The new WMDs. Either it will fade with no backlash or good folks will catch on.

mememeyou

how loudly can i say, "no shit" - though it still worked just as planned; preventing most libtards from looking in the mirror

ardvarcus

Russia was a complete red herring. Nobody would have followed the scent trail if the media hadn't started barking about it night and day.

derram

https://archive.fo/HSJ4k :

New Studies Show Pundits Are Wrong About Russian Social-Media Involvement in US Politics | The Nation

'Take the widespread speculation that Russian social-media posts may have suppressed the black vote. '

'Entertaining the possibility that Russian social-media posts impacted the election outcome requires more than just a contemptuous view of average voters. '

'Doing so leads us to conclusions that have nothing to do with Russian social-media activity, nor with the voters supposedly influenced by it. '

'It’s telling that those who are so certain Russian social-media posts affected the 2016 election never cite the posts that they think actually helped achieve that end. '

'As was previously known, about $46,000 was spent on Russian-linked Facebook ads before the 2016 election. '


This has been an automated message.