arrggg

Post the document, not a video of some idiot reading an extremely short summary of the document...

This document was apparently found in a copy machine in 1986. It appears to be a classified manual describing the use of social engineering to control the population. Read it for yourself, it is very interesting. Operations Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1.txt or Operations Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1.pdf

It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems(silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide. This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of persons in a position of great power and without full knowledge and consent of the public, uses such knowledge and methodologies for economic conquest - it must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said person or group of persons and the public. The solution of today's problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly candid, with no agonizing over religious, moral or cultural values. You have qualified for this project because ofyour ability to look at human society with cold objectivity, and yet analyze and discuss your observations and conclusions with others of similar intellectual capacity without the loss of discretion or humility. Such virtues are exercised in your own best interest. Do not deviate from them.

COUSCOUS

yeah,,,,no. I love a good conspiracy theory, but unless something amazing authenticates this, I call shenanigance.

Empire_of_the_mind

it's not important if the document is "authentic" or not. what's important is the techniques and motivations it describes.

COUSCOUS

Well, yes it does matter if it authentic, because this is what they are presenting it as. Sure the techniques and motivations it describes are nice to see in print and everyone should be aware of psyops. However, presenting something in a false setting does only damage. There are plenty of good publications on psyops (do not ask for any, i don't keep a list) and these should all be read voraciously. Not this questionable piece. If however, it was presented as just a piece of intellectual writing, it would be so much valuable. :)

Empire_of_the_mind

sometimes you have to slide your message in through the side door. it's like when David Icke talks about reptilians - that's his shield that allows him to say all the other stuff he says. it distracts dipshits, but no big loss.

COUSCOUS

no. I completely disagree. But we can agree on that.