Skyrock

Go away you misleading retard and crawl back to Reddit.

Monkeyshinerbot3000

Martin Ginsberg has been dead for years. This is quite possibly incorrect information.

HenryCabotLodge

Yes, but I was hoping :) Husband died in 2010. Creepy though it is the same name. Maybe he lives on too.

Civil_Warrior

Creepier still is he would have been 86 and the record is real. Ruth is actually Joan Ruth.

Rotteuxx

So you must be able to confirm she's the one and it's not a different Ruth Ginsburg.

Also there's no date on there nor a link to a verifiable source.

But regardless, her husband died in 2010 at 78 years of age you fake news slut !

Civil_Warrior

Yeah she should be Joan Ruth Ginsburg. But how many Ruth Ginsburg in Washington had a husband Martin... https://www.searchquarry.com/namesearch/results?trackstat=homepage-&fname=ruth&lname=ginsburg&recordtype=Death&state=DC

Civil_Warrior

A simple Google of who Martin Ginsburg is will help you.

Rotteuxx

Which one ?

Her husband was Martin David Ginsburg, born June 10, 1932, died June 27, 2010.

Civil_Warrior

1932+86= Hint it's not June yet

Rotteuxx

What the fuck are you rambling about ?

Civil_Warrior

Simple math. I guess I lost you. What do you suppose the statistical chances are here of having a husband on record same name and same age. Are you able to comprehend these concepts? They are pretty simple. If his name and birthdate were on file it may have simply calculated his age overlooking that he's dead.

Rotteuxx

100% pure speculation

Civil_Warrior

So you missed the point entirely. It's not pure speculation when you are looking at an obvious statistical anomaly. There is something there that should be followed up on. Pure speculation would be in the absence of such. Glad I could clear that up for you.

Rotteuxx

Sure, Bub.

Tallest_Skil

Except her husband is dead nine years.