AsOnlyIAm

My friends dad had cancer. He was given a stem cell replacement sergery and told to stay away from all children for 6mo. He was told Vaccinations contain live organisms and he will catch what they have been Vaxxed for. Interesting thing, her Dad is in his early 70's (the flu shot'ers) and they mentioned Children...

turitelle

Its widely known that the kids shed the virus that they are vaccinated for, and sometimes they get sick from it too. I know somebody whose kid had the measles and she hauled him across the country in a fricking airplane, her rationale was "but its ok, he was vaccinated."

But of course its the unvaccinated kids who get the blame.

AnmanIndustries

No one here (except one person voted down) understands that all vaccines work differently and all illnesses work differently. Whooping cough has several stages. The vaccine provded (in australia at least) is designed to stop young children from getting a lethal infection. They can still get sick and adults can still get sick, but with the vaccine it is downgraded to a regular infection. And as it is with most i fection based immunizations, they are not permanent due to the nature of an evolving immune system and evolving viruses and similar.

Liberameya

Were they vaccinated against whooping cough? Duh

ardvarcus

Vaccinations are dangerous. Don't get them. Don't give them to your kids.

IIJOSEPHXII

They must have been down on the list to recieve non-toxic placebos. Healh care, and therefore life chances, are all governed by blacklists. The children of people on the blacklists recieve shots designed to debilitate and disable them, while children of those members of a rigged society recieved a different formula.

It's the same with chemtrails. Why would they spray everybody everywhere? Because what they are spraying is curable and health care has been rigged with blacklists, and people on the blacklists aren't going to recieve the correct treatments when they go in with the symptoms of chemtrail poisoning.

meowski

They'll find some way to blame this on the unvaccinated kids

fastregister

id blame the vaccinated ones, for carrying the virus unknowingly, spreading the disease everywhere. because the vaccine contains the virus, and you see, it didnt work but still gave them the virus. by injecting virus and bacteria, they may even create a mutated drug resistant mega-virus, then everyone dies.

meowski

It's well known this happens with flu and polio vax

ConservativeDev

Correct, they are effective but not perfect. Pertussis is different in that immunity wanes after two years. Even if you get the infection you're not naturally immune for life and can still get it. There are virtually no risks in vaccinations and an 80-90% effectiveness is well worth it.

madmalloy

Feel free to wreck your own immune system by installing big pharma vaccine malware.

meowski

Not a single unvaccinated kid contracted whooping cough, yet you're going to stand by this garbage 80-90% effectiveness number? Outbreaks routinely happen in fully vaccinated populations. The problem is their numbers are cooked. The FDA trusts vaccine manufacturers to do their own efficacy and safety studies so this should not be a surprise.

Elcycs

30 out of 1600-18 is would make it 98.1% effective.

Those knuckleheads must have cooked the numbers backwards!

meowski

You're making the assumption that every kid was exposed. This is not a valid assumption. However if vaccines are highly effective (>90%) and unvaccinated are more vulnerable, you would expect to see at least at least a few unvaccinated kids contracting it.

Elcycs

True, but this is highly contagious. Instead of bouncing up and down about how some people still go sick I'd expect sane people to say things like "good thing many were vaccinated or this could have been a disaster!"

There's no way to know how many were exposed, but as it's highly communicable in a crowded public place, a lot more than 30 is a safe bet.

Article also mentions that this particular vaccine starts at 80 to 90% and fades over time. How long since these kids the vaccine?

Sounds like it worked as expected to me.

meowski

Typically (assuming the manufacturer's numbers to be accurate) the protection wanes gradually over 5-10 years and doesn't simply drop off a clilff after 1 year.

The majority of vaccinated individuals following the recommended vaccine schedule, which takes this into account.

With this in mind, we would expect to see a much higher rate of infection among unvaccinated individuals. To have infection only in vaccinated individuals and none in unvaccinated, the currently accepted efficacacy numbers would have to be wildly off.

Admittedly it's a small sample size, and just back of napkin estimates, but still, by spidey sense is tingling.

ConservativeDev

Yes. In a 2010 outbreak the unvaccinated were 8 times more likely to contract it. Are you really going to point to 30 cases in one outbreak as evidence that unvaccinated people don't contract it?

meowski

Brought to you by: Vaccine Shill

ZenAtheist

only 18 opted out of vaccinations for medical reasons. None of the 30 students who contracted whooping cough were not vaccinated.

GASP That can't happen! Vaccines protect you against the disease!

ha

ConservativeDev

There is no medical treatment that is 100%...so we should do away with all medicine right?

NumbDigger

0% of the time, it works every time.