Wait! I just thought of something, if everything on the net is spammed and fake, that makes "real data" much more valuable.... ( conspiracy )

submitted by k_digi

Because of 'Censorship 2.0' and the rise of bots that will ' create opinion' and also decide if things are unpopular.

If a site can take advantage of algorithms to allow "real data" actual information flow that site is going to have a high value.

To a degree Voat has partly achieved that, and this has also made it a 'high value' target.

Interesting.

Some people call it "trolling" it's more info manipulation than anything. it's the belief that one force can control information flow and the resulting "opinions" by controlling content with "spam" and creating "opinion" it is the only option now that centralized forces of info are ineffective.

k_digi

It's definitely a start, and you can see it scares 'people'

k_digi

na i think everyone believes the "CIA" and a few hired foreigners assassinated JFK, it's pretty obvious. the why is up for conjecture, i'd say "why not?" is more the point. if there was enough motive and info control of the scene and no opposition then they could do it, he's dead, it's history.

deathcomesilent

Lee Harvey Oswald was a US marine. Every service person in the US forces goes through the ASVAB (among other psychological evaluations). These psych-profiles will almost certainly tell the powers that be, who is subordinate, who is impressionable, but most of all (in these cases) who is mentally unstable enough to be recruited into certain off-books operations. The CIA (in that era, perhaps to this day) ran these operations, because military is unpredictable. Military peoples are generally normal humans with training. CIA people are seemingly less likely to have families (ransom/blackmail potential is too high), and seemingly more likely to have their own subjective moral systems (willing to do almost anything for the greater good as they view it).

As I understand it, JFK's push to end the federal reserve would have freed a generation from the effects of the fractional reserve system. This would have indirectly shifted control fom the government, back to the people. It would also end the pseudo-government bank known as the federal reserve. Most likely, someone didn't like the idea of the fed going away, so they shot him. Might have been a psychologically-conditioned LHO, he might have been a fall guy. No way we're gonna know that part for sure unless we get new documents declassified for the public.

Mumberthrax

I don't understand what you mean when you say "everything on the net is spammed and fake". Would you be willing to clarify/elaborate?

What is censorship 2.0? What are these bots "creating opinion" you speak of?

What is the "real data" you refer to?

This is all rather confusing and reads like a jumble of random phrases stuck together into a post.

k_digi

if that is a genuine response, i can explain:

you have symptoms of what is called "information feed confusion"

what occurs in this scenario is all of the persons input info is literally "fed" to them so they get the {answers} and the {questions} this results in eventually the inability to comprehend actual new data that does not correspond to the "Feed"

when you say something like:

This is all rather confusing and reads like a jumble of random phrases stuck together into a post.

it sounds scarily like that.

Mumberthrax

Where can I learn more about the malady that I've been diagnosed with? :P

And you still haven't really clarified anything about your original post.

k_digi

not sure what you can do? sometimes it's just the math of the universe, it's your path. whatever you feel do that, start by turning the TV off or at least understand how the TV works.

Mumberthrax

ok, so trolling is the game. got it.

Empire_of_the_mind

Watch for 'ASKVOAT' type posts where someone tries to get you to give away your age, where you're from, what your job is, and other questions mostly designed to get at info that is useful to marketers.

deathcomesilent

I usually make a point of commenting in those threads and letting them know that such questions are impolite in person, and are just as impolite on the internet.

The concept of being polite while anonymous is kind of BS, but that's often enough to make people indignant about strangers probing for their deepest info. I think we need to have more people that actually speak up and let these (quite possibly innocent) users know that we believe Voat is not an unlimited survey platform for their curiosities and personal vindication.