Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Say Berkeley, Stanford Studies

Odds Hillary Won Without Widespread Fraud: 1 in 77 Billion Say Berkeley, Stanford Studies ( nationalvanguard.org )

submitted 2019-03-18T14:54 by salvia_d

7 comments

WroteVoatGoat 2019-03-18T18:08

Not sure how they arrived at this number. If she voted for herself wouldn’t her odds at least reduce to 1 in 300 million?

link

CatsControlTheEU 2019-03-18T15:54

I'm pretty certain there was fraud involved, but Standford/Berkeley are not exactly the most unbiased sources. Two of the most SJW universities in the entire nation in the state that Bernie got the most support out of.

link

Cloudrdr 2019-03-18T15:54

Oh yeah, researchers, BTW, there was a GENERAL ELECTION she TRIED TO STEAL, Too? You got ANYTHING on THAT?

link

trevmon 2019-03-18T19:10

may have tried to but didn't, what I'd like to know is how trump put a stop to that

link

Cloudrdr 2019-03-19T01:19

I'm not sure he even had to. I have seen a LOT of Presidential campaigns. Objectively, I have NEVER seen one as BAD as Hillary Clinton's 2016. Truly horrible.

link

trevmon 2019-03-19T13:47

I knew it was bad and she hardly tried but was still surprised trump won cuz I thought campaigning didn't matter since the voting machines are all rigged, something went down, would like to see a legit documentary on it.

link

Cloudrdr 2019-03-19T18:36

I am certain that in the fullness of time, ALL THINGS THAT ARE HIDDEN WILL BE REVEALED.

If the object of this exercise is to trade ONE SET OF LIES for a DIFFERENT SET OF LIES, it will fail.

It does NOT appear to be failing, so...maybe we get lucky and discover a NEW WORLD of truth, prosperity and beauty to replace the Hideous Crapfest which the Black Hats have been organizing here for millennia.

link