KEVDOG77

Also Aussie PM: I demand a crack down on the internets, but ignore my porn browsing history...

cm18

Governments and power structures are under an existential threat from the internet. It continually challenges propaganda and false narratives. What's more, as long as the internet connects various countries, war between nations cannot be fomented.

SavageSeasons

By what authority does he even have a right to ask this?

IIJOSEPHXII

Does every post @madmalloy make have the words "shooting" or "shooter" or variants thereof in the title? A military intelligence signal booster and decepticon methinks.

WolfmanBill

While Morrison makes his calls for increased media and i'net censorship I will go on calling for his and all of his immediate predecessors in the post as PM, to be arrested and brought to trial as capital offenders for allowing Terrorgruppe Kurzberg the "Celebrating Jews of 911" safe passage in Brisbane since the day of the outrage.

Monkeyshinerbot3000

No we begin to see just how tyrannical these "free world" leaders really are.

Sallywuffs

Two for one. Stage a false flag and suppress free speech and gun rights at the same time.

Adminstrater

So did the attack happen to facilitate this, or is this one of those, "leave no tragedy to waste"?

northportage

Good luck with that you totalitarian assholes.

NosebergShekelman

oy vey we must keep the goyim from talking and celebrating this or it will catch on!! You white honkey's need to embrace your diversity because The Kalergi Plan isn't going to do itself

oligarchsalamander

Again exactly what the shooter wanted.

squidicuz

LIES ARE NEWS AND TRUTH IS OBSOLETE!

The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are.

Yuke

A couple of questions on this incident:

1.) I've seen some video of the first mosque attack, was there video of the second?

2.) The news over here (UK) is reporting things like the gunman shooting a man and his kid as he was running away with her in his arms. I don't remember this from what I saw. Did this occur and/or was it in the second mosque attack?

3.) The news is also reporting 50 injured, 30 of which are injured with gunshot wounds. Again, from what I saw, it looked like he cleaned up pretty good and killed them all, and 30 people surviving with gunshots wounds, given the guns involved as well, seems unrealistic. Again, could this have been more so from the second mosque?

If anyone could answer these questions that would be great.

Gorillion

Sad thing is that the choice was him and an actual right wing guy to replace the previous unpopular faggot PM. This guy is a total worm from all accounts.

YugeDick

Proof positive that this was not a false flag. False flags get waved around. They're trying desperately to keep people from seeing this one.

cursedcrusader

I don't agree at all. The opposite. They wave around false flags like crazy to impose more restrictions on the people.

YugeDick

They simply don't memory hole a false flag. They memory hole the proofs of its falsehood. In this case they're doing everything to memory hole the event itself. The only coverage you hear is damage control because this event caused them much damage.

https://www.voat.co/v/whatever/3105415

https://files.catbox.moe/k6praf.jpg

17484375?

So they're just going to outright ban free speech sites like voat and the chans and the big guys (Facebook, YouTube and Twitter etc) will censor and ban more stuff.

vastrightwing

It is unacceptable to treat the internet as an ungoverned space

Translation: it is unacceptable to allow people to be able to communicate so easily. We need total control of all communications.

version7

It really is sad that they can not see themselves turning into the tyrants they claim to hate. Beyond that he's inviting a yellow vest moment. May the people overthrow him quickly and with out hesitation.

crazy_eyes

you can not truly believe that

version7

No man is a villain in their own story.

crazy_eyes

Then what would be their justification for disarming and silencing opposition?

Rawrination

Because they see people as sheep and themselves as wolves. Wolves don't seem themselves as evil. They just see sheep as food, and sometime toys.

dontdoxxmefaggots

They see. They know. They don’t care

Hitlers_Politoed

They think it’s funny.

version7

Ideally they are booted from office right away and by any means available.

thereare4lights

The people in NZ just turned in their guns like the good sheep they are. They're not going to do anything about anything.

version7

I wonder how true that story is. How many people actually did turn in their guns and whether the media is possibly lying to encourage others to do as they want.

senpaithatignoresyou

Oh my! That will destroy social media. I am not surprised however, because none of those fagots in silicone valley have realized that the rest of the world is gunning for them.

vastrightwing

Will? Social media has never been social media: it has always been a data collection platform and propaganda distribution.

Looked at this way, what we've been seeing makes a lot more sense. By banning narratives that go against the official narrative the feudal corporate lords control the population.

angryspin

They're all shit platforms that masquerade as supporters of freedom of speech. What they're really after is the chans and voat (no mention as they don't want to advertise them).

I've also seen since our most recent "event" that we're being pummeled by Mossad and a host of other agencies.

The manipulative language of some of these submissions are just ridiculous and trying to lure goats into taking the dangling carrot.

Computergeek01

This is just the typical Euro trash taking advantage of the media spotlight to kick American companies in the nuts. They jizz in their pants at the thought of breaking up these monopolies.

Pwning4Ever

So to live in a diverse Utopia, we must surrender all of our rights.

cm18

Utopia -> distopia

vastrightwing

Part and parcel.

squidicuz

A gramme in time saves nine!

Malayar

What the fuck does this even mean

LexOrandiLexCredendi

Brave New World is definitely worth a read. Then go and watch Huxley speaking at Berkley.

The look into Huxley and his work with the MKULTRA guys.

Brave New World is a blueprint.

Jewed

It's a Brave New World.

CrustyBeaver52

Yes, clearly Facebook inspired this attack.

Another_Lemming

Well that Accelerated quickly.

jbo5112

Nunes is making a good start

squidicuz

What a surprise.

bruce1337

I'm shocked! SHOCKED!!

WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI

hahahaha NO

We got our freedom by fighting the UK when it was the largest and most powerful empire on the planet, but we're going to throw it away because somebody shot a few muslims in new zealand? Get your head out of your ass

Rawrination

The freedom was taken in 1913. Its been being eroded since. At some point we're going to have to muster what freedom we have left and destroy the bastards.

InternationalGoy

What he's really saying is to crack down on PUBLIC DEBATE.

Totalitarians ALWAYS say that censorship and banning of opposing political groups is for moral reasons. ALWAYS..

GapingAnus

Not at all. They want a lively public debate with hot tempers on all sides... but only for those pre-approved topics of discussion where the public can get their 2 minute hate in and burn off some frustration with no actual effect.

It's not often I say this but Chomsky was right:

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....”

MisterWalker

Chomsky assh*les ..

Noam Chomsky who says False Flags are " not serious " has been a hair on the arse of the 911 & JFK assassination conspiracies since forever.

False Flags are "serious" as well they are a capital offense.

Chomsky has repeatedly expressed arrogance and contempt towards the 9/11 truth movement which according to him peddles "arcane and dubious theories," and speaks of "crimes far more serious than blowing up the WTC," belittling the deaths of thousands of Americans in the attacks, along with millions in the Moslem world and thousands of US troops in the wars launched under the pretext of 9/11 that followed.

He maintains Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman who shot President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas Texas in November 1963, totally in contempt of video and photographs that show LHO at the doorway of the TSBD when the shots were fired in the first instance, and when The Three Tramps were marched by hours later, similarly exculpating him for the murder of Dallas Police Officer JD Tippit .

GapingAnus

How is this relevant in any way?

Privacy_Terms

Say whatever you want within the Overton Window, but don't dare step outside of it.

fuckingpasswordsman

It's not often I say this but Chomsky was right

Right there with you. Chomsky is a rootless cosmopolitan, an ivory tower academic, a hand-wringing charicature of the hook-nosed, sneering Jew, but his book Manufacturing Consent is worth the read (if you haven't read it already). It really breaks down how legacy media controls the mind of the average man.