There is very little to claim with evidence but Dave Schmidt focuses on points that are less geared towards the fear aspect. This gives him a viewpoint that has integrity. I have just recently came across him so I cannot attest that this person is as absolute, but ultimately disinfo is created to offer confusion to those who are searching for truth. Karen Hudes has been blowing the same horn for quite some time with little to no progress in what she discusses. It's odd for an activist acting on their own to offer so little change or progress, but there are some points that seem to have little bits of truth. But that's really all you need to lead someone off the beaten path using disinfo. I have havent looked into her work to make a final conclusion, but that the vibe I get from her. I am unfamiliar with Nasara and Keenan so I cannot assess their work. Its hard to declare who is supporting what & what their true intentions are, but I will treat it more as a reference point - so if anything does come in my research that supports any of their claims, I am glad to point them out. But currently, all their work stands idle and are in a position where we can just do the best WE can and hope that the people find a way to regain trust in themselves. It's too soon to make any solid statement regarding all of their information, and a lot of the stuff I have looked into myself tends to have its own story so there is even the possibility that none of them are accurate.

As the reddit thread suggested, its interesting to see it unfold & that's ultimately my reasoning to share.

this whole soap opera is worth ignoring